This article is devoted to the alimentary aspect of the image of the Other in the Russian sector of the Internet. Being a part of a more complex research, the article offers a comparison of the most frequent queries related to the alimentary nature of the Other for the last two years. The authors, using the Pearson correlation method, build models of alimentary characteristics of the otherness, comparing them with similar models in 2018. The analysis of Internet queries revealed the most popular stereotypes about the nutritional preferences of the Other and the fears associated with it. Comparison of the data obtained over two years showed the stable and dynamic aspects of the alimentarity of the Other. Each of the constructed models reflects both the real facts of alimentary culture of other peoples, and stereotypes based on fear of Alien.
The study of the dynamics of alimentary otherness markers revealed the fact of qualitative changes in the interest in gastronomic practices of the Far Eastern peoples with fixation of attention on the visual component of the process of eating, while markers of cannibalism, which were relevant to the images of the Other in 2018, are no longer in the new data. This research also confirmed the thesis of blurring cultural boundaries in the characteristics of the alimentary otherness in the image of the Other.
Aliev, R. T. & Yakushenkova, O. S. (2018). Alimentary Models of the Imaginative Other. The Caspian Region: Politics, Economics, Culture, (4), 162-170. (in Russian)
Aliev, R. T. & Yakushenkova, O. S. (2019). Research Calculations. Correlation Table and Matrix. Retrieved from http://rastaliev.site/files/alstud2019/cortable.xlsx (in Russian)
Babushkin, A. P. (2003). Stereotypes as a Means of Understanding the Facts of the Other Culture. In N. A. Fenenko, & V. T. Titov (Eds.), The Problem of Understanding In Dialogue: A Collection of Scientific Papers (pp. 22-27). Voronezh: Voronezh State University. (in Russian)
Bakhtin, M. (1979). Author and Hero in Aesthetic. In M. Bakhtin, Aesthetics of Verbal Creativity. Moscow. (in Russian)
Buc, P., Keil, M., & Tolan, J. (2016). Jews and Christians in Medieval Europe: the Historiographical Legacy of Bernhard Blumenkranz. Turnhout: Brepols Publishers n.v.
Chisinau, E. V. (2010). The Metaphorical Filling of the Conceptual Dyad "Own – the Other" in the Totalitarian Political Discourse. In M. V. Pimenov (Ed.), Conceptual Studies in Modern Linguistics: A Collection of Articles (pp. 452-458). St. Petersburg – Horlivka: Publishing House of the State Pedagogical Institute of Geology. (in Russian)
Cohen, J. J. (Ed.). (1996). Monster Theory: Reading Culture. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Dubossarskaya, M. L. (2012). “Own”, “Alien”, “Other” in the Clash of Cultures (Based on Material from the Peruvian Chronicles of the 16th Century). PhD thesis. Moscow. (in Russian)
Fiennes S., Holly K., Rosenbaum M. (Producers), Zizek S. (Writer), & Fiennes S. (Director). (2012). The Pervert's Guide to Ideology. [Motion Picture]. UK, Ireland.
Foucault, M. (1997). Madness and Civilization: A History of Insanity in the Age of Reason. St. Petersburg. (in Russian)
Gregorash, B. J. (2019). The Routledge Handbook of Gastronomic Tourism. Anatolia-International Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Research, 30(3), 442-444. doi: 10.1080/13032917.2019.1643641.
Grishaeva, L. I. (2003). Acculturation as a Transformation of the Opposition "Own" - "The Other". Volgograd: Change. (in Russian)
Gruen, E. S. (2011). Rethinking the Other in Antiquity. Princeton: Princeton University press.
Holliford, S., & Widdet, S. (2008). Motivation: A practical guide for managers. Moscow: GIPPO. (in Russian)
Husserl, E. (2001). Cartesian Meditations. St. Petersburg: Science. (in Russian)
Korchak, A.S. (2006). The philosophy of the Other “Me”: History and Modernity. Moscow: LENAND. (in Russian)
Levinas, E. (2007). The Path to the Other. (E. Bakhtina, trans.) St. Petersburg: Publishing House of St. Petersburg University. (in Russian)
Lévi-Strauss C. (1999). Mythologiques. V. I. The Raw and the Cooked. Moscow, St. Petersburg: University book. (in Russian)
Lévi-Strauss, C. (1963). Structural Anthropology. New York: Basic book, Inc.
Maslow, A. H. (1943). A Theory of Human Motivation. Psychological Review(50), 370-396.
Neumann, I. B. (1998). Uses of the Other. "The East" in European Identity Formation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Pakholova, I. V. (2010). Sociocultural Experience of the Other. PhD dissertation. Samara. (in Russian)
Parasecoli, F. (2011). Savoring Semiotics: Food in Intercultural Communication. Social Semiotics, 21(5), 645-663. doi: 10.1080/10350330.2011.578803.
Ray, U. (2015). Introducing 'Foreign' Food Changes in the Gastronomic Culture of Colonial Bengal. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781107337503.
Romanova, A. P., Khlyshcheva, E. V., Yakushenkov, S. N., & Topchiev, M. S. (2013). The Other and Cultural Security. Moscow: ROSPEN. (in Russian)
Romanova, A. P., Yakushenkov, S. N., Khlyshcheva, E. V., Kanateva, N. S., Yakushenkova, O.S., Topchiev, M. S.,. . . Morozova, E. V. (2018). The Other with Many Faces. Invariance of the Other’s Images. Astrakhan: Publisher: Sorokin Roman Vasilievich. (in Russian)
Santa Cruz, F. G., Tito, J. C., Perez-Galvez, J. C., & Medina-Viruel, M. J. (2019). Gastronomic Experiences of Foreign Tourists in Developing Countries. The Case in the Cty of Oruro (Bolivia). Heliyon, 5(7), 8. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02011.
Sartre, J. P. (2000). Being and Nothing: An Experience of Phenomenological Ontology. (V.I. Kolyadko, Trans.) Moscow: Republic. (in Russian)
Semenova, T. I. (2008). The Methodological Status of the Other and His Role in the Conceptualization of the Inner Sphere of Human. In Ethnosemiometry of Value Meanings: Collective Monograph (pp. 169-185). Irkutsk: IGLU. (in Russian)
Shipilov, A. V. (2008). Own, Alien and the Others. Moscow: Progress Tradition. (in Russian)
Stringfellow, L., MacLaren, A., Maclean, M., & O'Gorman, K. (2013). Conceptualizing Taste: Food, Culture and Celebrities. Tourism Management, (37), 77-85. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2012.12.016.
Waldenfels, B. (1999). The Answer to the Other: the Main Features of the Responsive Phenomenology. In B. Waldenfels, The Other's Motive (p. 130-131). Mn. (in Russian)
Waldenfels, B. (2002). The Alien Phenomenon and His Traces in Classical Greek Philosophy. Topos, (2), 4-21. (in Russian)
Yakushenkov, S. N. & Yakushenkova O. S. (2012). Barbarian Body: Construction of the Alien’s Body on the Chinese Frontier. The Caspian Region: Politics, Economics, Culture, 4(33), 233-240. (in Russian).
Yakushenkov, S. N. (2012a). The Image of the Other: from Deconstruction to Construction. The Caspian Region: Politics, Economics, Culture, (3) , 242-249. (in Russian)
Yakushenkov, S. N. (2012). The Evolution of the Image of the Other on the Example of the European Discourse on Vampires (We shall Say a Word about the Poor Vampire). The Caspian Region: Politics, Economics, Culture, (2), 263-269. (in Russian)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.