STEPPING OUT OF DIVINITY: TOM KING'S “ALL-

Theis paper focuses on American superhero comics – i.e. superadventures and their likeness to mythology. Our goal is to understand how subtle changes in the characterization of a superhero may make them more congruent with the present day morality and ideals of the society, even if a given character is willing to directly challenge that morality. Therough a close reading of Batman #53, in which Bruce Wayne states that Batman is like a god and that he does not believe in him anymore – nor should the people of Gotham – we discuss the symbolic meaning of Bruce Wayne's phrase and the implications for the readers' understanding of who the Batman is and what he stands for. One of the main impacts of this characterization is that Batman ceases to be the “interventionist god” as he was portrayed in many stories in the last decades, and learns to embrace the frailty and limitations of the human condition.


INTRODUCTION
In this article, we will analyze Bruce Wayne's statement about his "atheism" in relation to Batman and the acceptance of its fallibility and limitations in Batman #53, with script by Tom King and art by Lee Weeks (2018). Under a discussion of the mythical aspects of superhero comic books, we make a close reading of that issue, understanding that the "atheism" statement contradicts to the previous characterizations of the character -in which Batman's/Bruce Wayne's view of his role verged on that of an "interventionist" god, which was is so prevalent that the Kingdom Come limited series features his totalitarian control over Gotham City Klock 2013).
American superhero comics, especially the main line titles from DC Comics and Marvel Comics, are not just "superadventures" , i.e. narratives in which we follow great achievements made by beings with physical and intellectual capacities vastly superior to that of the ordinary human being, but also supernarratives that have been going on for at least six decades.
As pointed out by Douglas , the superadventures by the two main American publishing houses that publish superheroes comics do not, in general, take place in a self-contained and self-referential way. Instead, they establish links -no matteer how tenuous -with a given series featuring events that occurred in past editions of these series, other series of concomitant publication and even events narrated in stories published years or decades ago.
Theis narrative continuum of superadventures would thus demand the reader to become a super reader  capable of identifying the referentialities of the stories and also willing to investigate those elements cited that are not in the super reader's repertoire. Theis phenomenon is sometimes frowned upon and during the 1990s, for example, it was not uncommon to afficrm the need to have an "x-PhD" to accompany the adventures of the X-Men . One of the side effeects of this is the difficculty of gaining new readers since there is a need to become a super reader in order to be able to effeectively enjoy the narratives without a constant feeling of confusion. Even self-contained stories in limited series and graphic novels feature characters who have an extensive background, and even narratives that take place in other continuities -i.e. Else-worlds and What If€? stories -ofteen refer to events of the main continuity, with which they establish a relationship of antithesis or complementation.
One of the possible editorial solutions to resolve this impasse is a reboot, i.e. the restart and consequent simplificcation of the whole continuity of the supernarrative, thus offeering a point of entry for new readers . Thee procedure has been used three times by DC Comics in the past four decades, featuring as transition narratives the limited series Crisis on Infinnite Earths [1985][1986], Flashpoint [2011] and DC Rebirth [2016]. Ofteen afteer events such as these, the numbering of some -if not all -monthly superhero magazines is restarted from issue #1, which reinforces the invitation for new readers to join -an implicit message of facilitation, a safe haven for the arrival of newcomer readers (Kukkonen 2013). DC even held crossover events with more specificc consequences for the continuation of the supernarrative, such as Zero Hour [1994]. Marvel Comics waved to this same measure on two occasions, from the events Onslaught [1996] and Heroes Reborn [1996][1997], in which characters from four series -Captain America, Fantastic Four, Iron Man and The Avengers -migrated to a diffeerent continuity, in which their stories were restarted without references to past events, and in Ultimate Marvel [2000][2001][2002][2003][2004][2005][2006][2007][2008][2009][2010][2011][2012][2013][2014][2015], which again presented a new continuity for some of its most famous characters, although without replacing them in the main continuity. Thee reboot of an entire continuum is a rather drastic measure that bothers loyal readers as much as it is appealing to novice readers -it has so far been avoided by Marvel Comics and, like the brief 5-year gap between Flashpoint and DC Rebirth seems to demonstrate, may have limited beneficts or even have reached a point of exhaustion .
Another, more moderate way of offeering points of entry to new readers is the revamp, i.e. the renewal of specificc series, teams and characters -which can sometimes even run isolated from the rest of the supernarrative, although there are ofteen points of convergence afteer few months or years of publication , Klock 2013. We can list three essential paths for the renovation of superheroes: the generational transition, the redesign of a character and the construction of new characterizations.
Thee generational transition is possibly the most evident of these procedures and has been present for a long time in the history of the publication of superheroes, as can be seen in the appearance of characters from the so-called Silver Age [approximately between the 1950s and 1980s]: the ficrst Flash (Jay Garrick, created in 1940), Green Lantern (Alan Scotte, created in 1940) and Human Torch (Jim Hammond, created in 1939) were reimagined from new incarnations in the characters Barry Allen (1956), Hal Jordan (1959) andJohnny Storm (1961). In all these three cases, the appearance of a new character did not initially establish any relationship with the previous version, but although there was never any kind of narrative link between the two Human Torches, in the two pairs of characters from DC the old generation eventually came to play a mentoring role towards their heirs 1 .
Thee emergence of direct or indirect heirs afteer a given protagonist is killed, incapacitated or somehow abandoned the superhero cloak is a common procedure especially in DC Comics 2 , as can be seen in the diffeerent generations of Flashes (Barry Allen, Wally West, Bart Allen), Green Lanterns (Hal Jordan, John Stewart, Kyle Rayner), Batmans (Bruce Wayne, Jean-Paul Valley, Dick Grayson), Robins (Dick Grayson, Jason Todd, Tim Drake, Stephanie Brown, Damian Wayne), Supergirls (Kara Zor-El 1, Matrix / Mother, Linda Danvers, Kara Zor-El 2), Suberboys (Kal-El / Clark Kent, Kon-El / Conner Kent, Jonathan Kent), and Blue Beetles (Dan Garrette, Ted Kord, Jamie Reyes) in which characters were effeectively substituted in the main continuity of the supernarrative, either temporarily or deficnitively, with short or long intervals between the end of one generation and the beginning of the next one 3 .
Thee second procedure consists of preserving the character, but with substantial transformations in the superhero's design, which is ofteen not limited to changes in his or her uniform and even implies the alteration of some key concepts around abilities and superpowers -e.g. the black uniform of Spider-Man [1984][1985], and the electric version of Superman [1997][1998]. Some of the generational transitions (Kyler Rayner, Jean-Paul Valley, Bart Allen, Conner Kent, Jamie Reyes) also involved the establishment of new designs for the characters.
Certain generational transitions, such as that of Green Lantern, Flash and Batman were eventually reversed and re-framed. Thee short durability 1 Initially, the characters created during the so-called Golden Age of DC Comics (1930s to mid-1950s) and those of the Silver Age (mid-1950s to mid-1980s) inhabited distinct narrative continuities, which were later characterized as parallel universes in the same multiverse that with increasing frequency came into contact with each other -since the story "Flash of Two Worlds!", published in Thee Flash # 123 in September 1961. From this editorial gesture the need arose to characterize all events of the Golden Age as independent events from those of the Silver Age, starring diffeerent characters even in the cases of superheroes who did not editorially went through a generational transition, such as Superman, Batman and Wonder Woman, who thus started having two distinct generations of the same characters-elements of narrative complexity that eventually made the post-Crisis in the Infinnite Earths reboot necessary, in which dozens of parallel universes were condensed and time-lines were unificed in a single universe. 2 Among the most iconic characters from Marvel Comics, the most significcant case is perhaps Spider-Man (Peter Parker, Ben Reilly, Mac Gargan, Matteie Franklin, Miles Morales and Otteo Octavius). 3 Superman underwent two more unusual types of substitution. He had four simultaneous successors afteer his "death" by the monster Doomsday -John Henry Irons/Steel, Conner Kent/Superboy, Eradicator and Hank Henshaw/Superman Cyborg -during the "Reign of the Supermen" arc, published between June and October 1993. He was also divided into two individuals in the "Superman Red / Superman Blue" arc, between February and June 1998, in a period in which he held powers related to energy manipulation. of a good part of these procedures may point to a contradiction within the traditions of superadventures. To the same extent that the growing complexity of supernarratives creates a need for indexing an earlier repertoire that may become a burden, more drastic atteempts to renew continuity and characters may also alienate readers, since the iconic/archetypal and relatively stable character of heroes that star in the pages of the DC and Marvel series since the 1930s may be one of the most atteractive aspects for audiences who are still dedicated to read their stories . Theis can be felt even in the fact that a significcant portion of super-adventure protagonists outside the Marvel/DC axis still somehow constitute a version of these iconic characters, whether in the form of inspiration, tribute, parody, satire or plagiarism : they overcome their condition of ficction characters to become archetypes or even new forms of myth (Reblin 2012), and as such they are hardly disposable. Finally, the third path among the possibilities of revamping presents a more subtle, but potentially more lasting solution: the gradual change of personality traits, the proficle of the actions and atteitudes of the characters, their opinions and concerns in terms of culture and society, politics etc. Theis type of solution allows for maintaining the most immediately recognizable aspects of the superheroes, while the changes re-position them in relation to the other characters and allow to establish new relationships with the values cultivated -or repudiated -by the readers. We can see this in the diffeerent ways in which Batman's stance on the use of ficrearms has been narratively constructed in quite diffeerent ways over the decades since his creation, pending between unrestricted use and absolute repudiation , or even the notion of "realism" that is present in his characterizations since Frank Miller's 1986 Thee Dark Knight Returns (Klock 2013) 1 . Something similar is pointed out by Lauren  when identifying the changes in Superman's characterizations as a mirror of changes through which the very idea of "American Dream", of which the character would constitute an expression, in at least three distinct phases -the Great Depression and World War II, the emergence of the USA as a superpower and the institution of the Comic Code in the 1950s, and social changes afteer the Vietnam War).

MYTH IN SUPERHERO COMICS
Humankind has always been in close contact with the notion of godhead, and in many monotheistic religions with the notion of a Messiahthe hope of a savior, of a protector, of someone who will bring justice to the weak. Each society obtained its heroes, its gods, its spiritual leaders. Thee role of mythology and religion, more than explaining the phenomena of life that cannot be understood by current knowledge, also brings hope for saviors, those who are in the image and likeness of the gods, or who are strong enough to challenge them, in both cases atteributing meaning to human existence (Cazelli 2019, p. 144).
Most civilizations across human history had their own ideal image of a savior. Greek mythology featured heroes who deceived the Olympian gods not sympathetic towards humanity -e.g. the demigod heroes like Hercules and Perseus, or the Titan Prometheus, creator of humanity, who by defying Zeus gave ficre to the men for developing their technologies: Prometheus was punished for this act, but still protected humanity from afar. Norse mythology included powerful and overwhelming gods like Theor, the god of thunder and Odin, the father of the gods. Theese two mythology systems also featured a grayer sense of morality, with extremely human gods and their selficsh atteitudes, like Zeus and Loki.
Thee patteern also expands in monotheistic Hebrew mythology, with Jehovah as a god of justice and an ideal of morality for his people, who following the patteern of other mythologies, demonstrates his superiority through power and intimidation and offeers protection and care in exchange for human ficdelity, but also punishment and death for those who defy and disobey him, while in the Christian New Testament Jesus' salvation mission is not achievable through physical means such as power and intimidation, but humanity, compassion, humility and meekness. His power is not to impose strength upon enemies, but to defeat "evil" with love.
Theat is why myths exist, and it is this ability to interpret the surrounding reality with imagination that makes humans symbolic and cultural beings. In order to seek knowledge, it is necessary to imagine, to express one's emotional needs as a collective and as an individual, it is necessary to imagine and interpret .
Myths have always been a mixture of imagination, knowledge, and culture. Even myths that are no longer part of current religious beliefs, such as Greco-Roman myths, still have a direct infliuence on the social imaginary of nations. Theese impacts and infliuences cannot be erased and ignored. Theus, mythologies are still present and infliuence cultures in mod-ern societies, still carrying several of their traditional elements, but also adapting to the historical-cultural scenario of their times, such as the ficction and entertainment industrial culture. Thee archetype nature of superheroes and superadventures, it seems, is a fertile ground for the expression of mythic content under a postmodern guise (Knowles, 2002;. In this sense, superheroes become a symbol that motivates humanity to move forward. Theis symbolic characteristic is not random or artificcial, but is due to the inspiration of these narratives in the mythical-religious tradition that preceded it and that remains, although not with the same strength, impregnated in the popular imagination. (Reblin 2012, p. 130) According to Madrid (2016, p. 3), American comic books emerged in the 1930s, more precisely around 1934, when the popular comic strips started being distributed in collections. During that time, America was facing the Great Depression, looking for an escape from the stress caused by the difficcult times of economic crisis, unemployment and uncertainties of the war. Seeking in ficction a means of transport to an easier and fantastical world. However, it was Jerry Siegel and Joe Shuster who gave the American people something they could immerse themselves in search of a savior, bringing to life Superman and originating the superhero genre in 1939. As a powerful, skillful being, it is undeniable that the character brought brightness to America with the hope of a savior at least in dreams and in the pages of comics .
Thee building of Superman is a mix of Greco-Roman myths, where physical strength, grandeur and superhuman powers demonstrate power over mere mortals, and as in Judo-Christian mythology in his impeccable morality, humility, kindness and charity, having values directly linked to Jesus Christ. In fact, it is possible to say that Superman is the Christ of comics . Thee ficrst of its kind, which was there before everything started, the whole mythology of Superman is based on the molds of a messiah. "Making it clear how [Superman] is seen in his own universe: a human nature and a divine nature, as announced by the Christian creed about Jesus of Nazareth" (Gomes & Barbosa 2019, p. 142). Gomes and Barbosa (2019, p.143) state that the similarities between Superman and Judo-Christian mythology and their messianic characteristics are visible and evident. Starting with the fact that its creators were Jewish, and the character was raised in a country founded on Protestant bases, e.g. the use of the word "El", which is the Hebrew word for "God", being used to name the character's kryptonian name, "Kal-El". His human name, "Clark", comes from Old English and means "cleric", and his surname, "Kent", is a Hebrew word that means "I have found a son". Gomes and Barbosa also believe that the surname may come from the word "krista", which means "Christ". Theere are parallels to both the mythology of Jesus and Moses, since littele Kal-El was sent to Earth on a ship to be saved from death, just as Moses was sent aflioat the Nile in a basket. Like Moses, Kal-El was raised among those who adopted him and was belatedly called to his origins for the liberation and protection of his people. Thee diffeerence is that he would be specificcally protecting his adopted people, not his already doomed homeland. Thee parallels with Jesus are even more direct, with his adoptive parents, Martha Kent, nicknamed Mary, referencing the mother of Jesus, and her father Jonathan "Joseph" Kent. However, in later editions the references were lost, including the lack of Jonathan's middle name. Theis does not, however, erase a direct reference to a humble family that creates in its simplicity the son of the gods, who has powers and talents beyond the comprehension of humankind.
Theis mythological aspect is a constant in the superhero genre, even among those which origins focus on science ficction, e.g. Marvel Comics' Fantastic Four's, or are more mundane, such as Batman's. In the end, the whole genre is geared towards a mythology of salvation 1 ).
However, is it possible to consider the superadventure narrative genre as a form of mythology? Cazelli presents some arguments for an afficrmative answer by stating that "Myths act as guides, leading us to live betteer, through the important lessons they teach us. " (Cazelli 2019, p. 170). Myths are nothing more than narratives which purpose is to explain phenomena of life and nature, its origins and functions from a mystical perspective, and also to transmit moral values in the collective imagination through the sacred, understanding daily life and human experience in a mystificed way.
Theerefore, according to Cazelli (2019, p. 154), the narratives of superhero comics feature such aspects and can be framed in the concept of "contemporary myths", since they present a modern guise of mythological and/or folkloric heroes, even in the context of capitalist mass-production of culture .
Another feature that supports it is the durability of myths in social imagination, even if their function changes. Greece-Roman myths, for example, had a religious aspect that no longer is active, however their direct infliuence on human values and institutions is still powerful and evident.
Greek academies were built on the foundations of mythology; institutions like Law, Astronomy and Medicine, stories told nowadays, mass production narratives, even Christianity has strong links with these myths considered as "pagan" through the merger that originated Catholicism. Somehow, the myths are updated, renewed, and re-framed. "Thee same is true of comics, with superheroes. Another aspect of the myths is the possibility of being retold (and, in the case of superheroes, of being reinvented) without being worn out; the myths are in-consumable. " (Reblin 2012, p. 138). Theey never die, but they are modificed to the current social and consumer culture, since the moral and ethical norms that superheroes need to reproduce also change. "Thee adventures of superheroes do not cease, but they continue to be told, adapted, invented and updated. Theey always respond to a context and change to match the context from which and for which they emerge. " (Reblin 2012, p. 138). Theis makes genre not only extremely infliuential in the social and collective imagination, but also reveals the cultural values of producers, consumers, and how market consumption infliuences these narratives through those aspects, making superadventures a completely new way of retelling myths and transmitteing their values.
Theus, it is possible to conclude that the mythological nature of superadventures and the messianic aspect of superheroes reveal the desires, hopes and wishes of contemporary American society , or even of humankind.
Ultimately, the stories of superheroes, the genre of superadventure itself, are contemporary mythologies interwoven into the complex web that constitutes contemporary cultural goods. If, on the one hand, they express the aspirations and pursuits of the contemporary human being -they rescue and represent values rooted in culture, remnants of a tradition, which are dear to the same contemporary human being, covering secularized symbols with a sacred aura -, on the other hand they are inserted in the cultural dynamics of post-industrial society: they participate in a Romanesque culture that tries to seduce the reader through the diffeusion of a mass superman, obeying the interests of a hegemonic class that produces meaning and, concomitantly to this class, the logic of the market. (Reblin 2012, p. 144)

METHODOLOGY
In this paper we present a close reading of Batman #53. As pointed out by David James (2020), the close reading is a set of practices ficrst proposed by I. A. Richards in Practical Criticism (2017) that puts the materialism of the text in ficrst place, directly observing its forms of construction and enunciation. As pointed out by  and , the close reading is usually related to formalistic perspectives of narrative analysis, although there are hybrid paths of reconciliation between such analytical procedures and interpretive approaches of a sociological nature. Theus, supported by  and , we start from the assumption that no text is capable of enunciating by itself and therefore, given the impossibility of coming into contact with "the text itself", we will analyze the narrative gestures of the Batman #53 text in dialogue with cultural and ideological aspects that we notice are constant in superhero comics, by summarizing the events in the comic and commenting upon them. While our focus will be on Tom King's words and plot, a few visual aspects will also be briefliy addressed.
Our discussion will thus focus on the mythological and messianic aspects of superadventures, based on the assumption that superheroes are heirs of these narrative forms Coogan 2006r). Born during the period of the Great Depression, superhero comics have brought an imagery turned to salvation and hope . According to , it is possible to fict superadventures as a form of mythical narrative, considering that an important aspect of myths is to reinvent themselves according to contemporary social conditions, including mass consumption products.
Theus, we will investigate how Batman #53 establishes a new relationship between Batman/Bruce Wayne and his understanding of his own social role, questioning the messianic dimension that the population of Gotham -as well as himself -projects on the hero.

BATMAN #53: STEPPING OUT OF DIVINITY
Like Superman, Batman is also a messianic ficgure -Theigpen states he even substitutes Superman as a monomythic ficgure since the 1980s. However, with some diffeerences and featuring other aspects as a symbolic image. Superman represents the ideal messiah, who comes from heaven, from light, from salvation -a "sun god", according to . In "Thee Batman Files", by Mattehew K. Manning, Batman expresses his vision on the Man of Steel, pointing out this fact: And that's how we're diffeerent. Clark embraces the light. In fact, his very superman abilities are derived from our solar system's yellow sun. While I lurk in the shadows, knowing that the Batman is only effeective to a public unsure of who or what I am, Clark parades around in the open, wanting his city to know its defender. He wants them to know that they're safe. Theat they have a guardian angel on their side (Manning 2011, p. 69).
Indeed, the partnership and deep friendship between Batman and Superman features a real and interesting symbolic contrast. Light and darkness, happiness and trauma, relief and fear (Klock 2013). Batman points to the divinity and glory that Superman represents: In addition to all this, in the comics, the dependence of Superman on the Sun refers to the dependence of Christ on the Father, a metaphorical way to represent truth and justice, as if it were an uphill turn towards something profound, irreducible and timeless, being a representation of God. (Gomes & Barbosa 2019, p. 149) In other words, Superman's powers come from the Sun, directly from God, being the divine and glorious messiah, while Batman is a humanized messiah, who does not show any diffeerences from his protected ones because he is also human, vulnerable, without any divine abilities and fantastic powers, and Batman himself demonstrates feeling his humanity in relation to the other mystical and powerful heroes -"Meta-humans", in DC's own terminology -he feels his mortality, his weaknesses. And as a human, mortal, full of weaknesses and as frail as any other human, he feels responsible to keep the other gods and glorious messiahs with the conscience of humankind. He is the one who enters Olympus as an equal to ensure that the humanity within each one never get lost -which in some stories have dire consequences, i.e. the "Tower of Babel" JLA arc . In this sense, Batman also refliects a messianic aspect of Jesus Christ, the god who made fliesh, became human, became mortal, made himself weak .
However, in Batman# 53 Tom King revealed the opposite: from Gotham's perspective, Batman is God. Not a messiah, a hero, or something tangible. "Theus, the myth constitutes a set of symbolic narratives that aim to convey a perspective of the sacred, which is necessarily beyond words, located in the 'mystery'" (Cazelli 2019, p. 151). Recalling Batman's humanity as nature, King shows through Bruce Wayne's lips his divine nature as a symbol.
Thee ficrst symbolic message of the work is to show which god will be referred to in the story to use as a parameter as a comparison to the hero. It is not initially said in words, but the sign of the cross, the crucificx (Fig-ure 1), which represents the death of Jesus Christ as a sacrificce to redeem the sins of humankind, is shown. Theerefore, the benchmark used by Bruce Wayne, is the Judo-Christian god.
Batman #53 is the third installment in the six-part Cold Days story arc, writteen by Tom King and penciled by Lee Weeks, in which Bruce Wayne is called on to sit as a jury in the trial of the villain known as Mr. Freeze. Thee reason was the capture of the villain by Batman, who used extreme physical and psychological violence to make Mr. Freeze confess guilt over a series of murders of women, who were killed by freezing. Mr. Freeze claims innocence, and that he only confessed because he was coerced by Batman. For this reason, recognizing his mistake as a vigilante and hero, Bruce was the one who articulated his participation in the Jury, in order to do justice and to correct the mistake that Batman (by extension, himself) committeed. Theis is one of the stories where the character needs to act not as a masked man, but as Bruce Wayne, his alter ego. As usual, the mission is not an easy one, as he alone needs to convince the rest of the jury that Batman made a mistake and Mr. Freeze, a villain, a criminal and a murderer, is for once innocent.
Theree arguments led the jury to believe that Mr. Freeze was guilty: the victims of the killing were frozen, which was the typical method of the villain; the fact that Mr. Freeze had his costume on and a gun in his hand when he was captured, already anticipating Batman's coming; and ficnally, his own confession. Bruce then counters these arguments: ficrst, he believes that someone was trying to incriminate the villain, and for this reason modificed the bodies; the second reason is that the fact of Mr. Freeze being armed and wearing his costume, derives from the awareness that Batman would go afteer him even though he was innocent, making the villain prepare for defending himself; and third reason is the fact that Mr. Freeze was coerced to confess due to the fear of dying at the hands of an uncontrolled Batman who atteacked him, and thus, in order to save his own life, and seeing that Batman would not return to reason, the villain confessed. Bruce reinforces this argument by using himself as an example, that he would also have done anything if it would have saved his parents' lives. However, all of these arguments are still insufficcient to convince the jury, since that would be admitteing that Batman had made a mistake in his judgment, which was inconceivable, since Batman supposedly never makes mistakes and is seen as superior to everyone else. It is from this part of the script that issue #53 begins.
Thee jury argues that there is no way Batman could be wrong in his judgment, since everyone at some point was saved by him, and everyone sees him as a god, and "God" never misses. With that statement, Bruce Wayne begins his argument regarding the third, and ficnal reason for the jury to condemn Mr. Freeze. Thee tycoon addresses Missy, one of the jurors, regarding the crucificx she wears on a necklace. Thee lady in question shows the crucificx, defensively stating that she believes in "God" and that she has served her church for 20 years, asking him if that was a problem. Bruce replies that this would never be a problem for him, but that since she wanted an argument that explained why Batman would make a mistake that would lead Mr. Freeze to be wrongly accused, her belief proved vital to his argument. Thee character's atteitude is defensive, which can be assumed by her question "Is that a problem?". In this interaction, there is a mirror of the reality shown by the relationship between Christian believers and society. Both myths and the media mirror the reality and historical context that are inserted, thus, a contemporary sign that is modeled to be understood by the reader who is experiencing that historical and social moment. " [...] if these symbolic productions reproduce, to some extent, social phenomena, it is urgent that we overcome the conception that they are simple products of a culture of uncritical mass. " (Cruz & Cruz 2019, p. 44) Jurywoman Missy, in her direct inquiry, is making it clear that she will not admit Wayne to belittele her by her religion or misuse this religion, making the tycoon assure her that her belief in the Judo-Christian god is not a problem, to which she responds: "Good. ". Here are some interpretive possibilities to justify Missy's defensive atteitude. One is the context of an environment where her religion being questioned and brought up is strange, since they are in a trial, so it is clear that Missy fears that her judgment will be diminished by her belief. Missy fears religious intolerance. Another is the suspicion of Wayne being an atheist. It is difficcult to consider the reason for the suspicion, but he is clearly taking a defensive stance, showing a certain dislike for the opposing religious views.
Still defensive, and a littele irritated, the jurywoman asks the young tycoon whether he believes in "God". Wayne's answer is that he used to, but does not believe anymore (Figure 2).  He says that his father, Theomas Wayne, used to believe in the Christian God. In the Father, in the Son and in the Holy Spirit: in his will, he trusted in the will of this god. Bruce's father wanted him to believe too, but he never forced him to -he wanted littele Bruce to come to this god of his own free will. But they went to church together, Theomas told him all the biblical stories, explaining what they could control, and what they couldn't. However, afteer his parents' tragic death, Bruce was hurt. He put aside any belief in a deity, and he believed in absolutely nothing that his father thought could save him, because he couldn't see anything about how his father could have been saved that day. And when Bruce lefte Gotham for a while, he looked for something solid that could restore his faith, looked for answers, and even paid for them, but nothing was found. So he went home, and waited for that something to ficnd him instead of looking for it himself. Thee communication of what this something would be becomes very clear, when the page shows Batman among the buildings of Gotham (Figure 3). Theis "something" was Batman. Figure 3. Bruce states he was found by Batman. (King & Weeks 2018, p.8) Bruce continues his argument, saying that everyone is gathered there because of that city, because of Gotham. And that if someone is a citizen of Gotham, then he or she knows, that that city is a place of monsters, of demons. And in the midst of all this chaos, there he is, the man with a bat stamped on his chest that ficghts all the thugs back. Everyone sees their brothers being rescued, their sisters returning home safely, all thanks to Batman.
When Missy asks Bruce back whether he believes in god, Wayne replies that he used to, but that his personal experiences led him to not believe in this god anymore. Right now we are faced with a social confliict that brings together opposing religious positions: Christianity and atheism 1 .
Afteer Bruce's initial response, he goes on to explain and argue how Missy's religious positioning is important to his argument that Batman was wrong in his judgment of Mr. Freeze: it is a story of conversion, a moment of self-discovery.
First, Bruce points to the fact that his father was a Christian, as was Missy. He declares that he was created by his father to believe in this God that he trusted so much, but wanted him to accept him of his own free will, that he himself would ficnd him. However, when his parents were murdered, Bruce could not see how his parents were under the protection of something greater, and his faith could not achieve anything.
1 It should be mentioned that this part of the dialogue resulted in a somewhat negative response from fans of the hero (Zachary 2018), because even though it is not the main focus of the story, here Bruce Wayne/Batman, reveals himself to be an atheist or agnostic. Theis is an interesting position if we consider that a superhero has the function of representing the current morality of the historical and social context in which he is inserted. According to Cazelli (2019, p. 159) the protagonist hero of the superadventure has the symbolic function of representing a model of human being that should be desired and imitated, since this symbol represents the best in the human constitution from a moralist point of view. Atheism was considered mostly immoral until not long ago and even today and, according to Hammer et al. (2012, p. 44-45) while declaring oneself an open atheist is not immediately problematic, and atheists are not popularly regarded as a marginalized group, an expressive majority of Americans disapprove of atheism and hold several morally negative prejudices towards atheists. Taking this into account, it is not surprising that the indication of Batman being an atheist caused such a commotion among the public, that Tom King himself came to express himself on the subject on Twitteer: "Lots of people saying Batman 53 (which I wrote) shows Batman is an atheist. Theat's not how I read that comic. But I don't think my reading of it is the most important one. Anyway, I hope you read the whole thing for yourself and decide for yourself.". Theis event clearly shows how entertainment media as a cultural product is related in the capitalist and postmodern context. Comics are consumer products, so they are marketable, but writers make choices when telling their story, and this narrative receives a response from the public, especially now that social media has brought the consumer audience in direct contact with creators and editors. Theerefore, the scene depicting jurywoman Missy asking in an accusatory tone whether Bruce Wayne believes in God, carries with it a great symbolic and social burden, and the response of the one who should represent the ideal to be achieved as a model of humanity, presented an answer that was not considered atteractive and satisfactory for a significcant portion of the public.
I… put aside believing in… a deity. Or believing in anything my father thought had saved him. I couldn't really see that anything had saved me. I lefte Gotham for a while. I searched for something solid to put my faith in. I asked a great deal of questions. I paid for some answers. But I didn't ficnd anything out there. As far as I went. So I came home… and I waited for something to ficnd me. (King & Weeks 2018, p. 7-8).
Figure 4. Bruce Wayne states that Batman was God to him in his symbolic nature. (King & Weeks 2018, p.11) Here begins the parallel between the relationship of the symbolic image between the Judo-Christian God and Batman. This comparison is made within the symbolic field. As previously shown, Batman is an image, an idea, a symbol, an expectation. Much more than skills, this being possesses the power enveloped by the mystery, as stated in his Secret Files: "Batman is only effective to a public unsure of who or what I am" (Manning 2011, p.69). In continuing with his argument, Bruce talks about how Gotham is seized by chaos and evil, without hope and expectations of a peaceful future, so when Batman appears and punishes evil, saving the innocent, it is inevitable that citizens will look at him with great admiration, faith and hope. "We see our brothers rescued, our sisters returned. A man with a bat on his chest keep us safe". (King & Weeks, 2018, p. 10). Just as Christ is represented by the sign of the cross, in order to refer to his sacred and divine nature, Batman is represented by the sign of the bat. Not much is known about Batman's nature, only the effect of his actions, and testimonies from citizens. Just as the nature of God cannot be revealed to men, so is Batman.
The divine mystery that can only be reached by witness. "Everything that the drama of the mysteries represents and produces in the viewer can also occur in the form of a spontaneous, ecstatic, or visionary experience without any ritual." (Jung 2018, p.121). The way he is called with a bright light source marking the bat sign in the sky, is closely related to a prayer of one who cries out for divine help.). The difference is that while God cannot reveal himself because his nature is unimaginable to humans, Batman is only "God" if he keeps his humanity hidden. Bruce makes it very clear that Batman was God to him, and still is to Gotham citizens and the jury therein a symbolic manner, the imagery that is related between the sign of the Judo-Christian God and Batman are very close. In other words, Bruce used the religion of Missy, which is prevalent in American society where the entire jury is present, because it is a collective imaginary sign, re-signifying it for his purpose, and because Batman assumes the function that "God" normally assumes for Christians, in other words, they share the same archetypal patterns. Therefore, when Missy asks Bruce if the argumentative justification he was using is to say that Batman is God, he confirms it; however, not in his absolute nature, in abilities and origin, but in his symbolic representation. "If you define God as... The infallible, the responsible, the one who determines life and death. Then yeah, that's my argument. I thought he was God." (King & Weeks 2018, p. 11). He closes this argumentative part by saying that it is for this reason that Missy, and all the jury there are so convinced that Mr. Freeze is guilty. For this is the word of God, Batman said that he is guilty, and God never makes mistakes. Everyone there owes their lives to Batman, and no one has the right to question his decisions, because he would be perceived as perfect, and his will would be the law. God is above everything and everyone, and God wears a cloak.
Thee characterization of super adventure as contemporary mythology is not atypical. Superhero stories are ofteen referred to as contemporary myths. Christopher Knowles, for example, links superheroes with archetypes drawn from mythical-religious traditions and legends: messiah, golem, amazon, brotherhood and magician. Duncan and Smith suggest that superheroes are considered modern myths because of their immersion in the popular imagination. (Reblin 2012, p. 129) Figura 5. Batman is God (King & Weeks 2018, p.14) Thee next step in Bruce Wayne's argument, afteer establishing this symbolic and archetypal relationship between God and Batman, is to present what diffeerentiates them, and what makes Batman not a God. What explain why Batman is not God. And for that, he uses the symbolic and archetypal similarity between the two using the myth of Job, when Job questions God because his life is falling apart. God, on his own initiative, destroyed the life of a righteous person, who without understanding it, questions God about the reasons for his misery. Job was a righteous, obedient, innocent man, and yet God punished and rebuked him when Job questioned the reason for his punishment. Afteer that, Bruce feels terribly ill and the jurywoman asks if he is feeling well. But he doesn't answer, just raises his head and says that he was terribly injured recently, in reference to the previous arc in which he almost married Selina Kyle (Catwoman) and was abandoned at the altar, exactly because it was Batman's cloak that took offe his happiness, the reason why he cannot be happy beside his beloved one. Bruce vents how much he put every bit of himself in Batman for years. Because he was good and could protect you from all evil, from all pain -his parents, his life, his city, and it was working, afteer so many years he could ficnally have something he never had. He was happy. But then everything fell apart, he fell apart, and he shouted at Batman like a prayer, begging to the mask, to the symbol on his chest, to the cloak, to help him. But he is still waiting.
And Bruce says: that he will always be waiting, because Batman is not God. Batman tries to be perfect, but he is not, he makes mistakes, and then he tries again. But the fact is that Batman if ofteen wrong. He cannot relieve pain, offeer Heaven, or comfort for those who have been killed. Bruce then states categorically to that jurywoman, that God blesses souls with grace, but Batman punches people with his ficst. He then calls the atteention of the jury that everyone is gathered to judge Mr. Freeze, that they all have the power to give or take away their freedom, and that this is a god-like power. Batman is as human as all of them there, but wearing a bat costume. Theat he is just a man, and that everyone there can be as wrong as he is, be as good as he is, and that they are not there to talk to God. And Bruce appeals that Mr. Freeze claimed that Batman was not acting like himself, and this indicates that he was distracted by something, and he was wrong. And in judging that case fairly, they would be the ones who would be saving Batman. With that, the issue ends with the end of the meeting, and the revelation that the jury has cleared Mr. Freeze of all charges.
To question God's decision, however unjust and perverse it may be, is a great sin, and if Batman is God, why would mere mortals who have been saved by him repeatedly question God's judgment on an ungodly man? Afteer all, Mr. Freeze was a criminal. But, what if in this specificc case he is innocent and Batman was wrong? Likewise, what if God makes a mistake? It is intrinsic in Christian culture (and I believe that in all cultures of Abrahamic religions) that questioning any aspect of the validity of the positions of God and religion is absurd. According to Dawkins (2006, p. 35) there is a cultural problem, especially in American society, in which to question any aspect of religion is a great disrespect, it is intolerance. Quaestioning the "why" about dogmas, the validity of religious intervention in the state, personal life or science, is unacceptable. Theat's because questioning God is unacceptable. It is this aspect that Tom King positioned very well in Bruce's argument about the natural tendency to not question Batman, afteer all, if he is God, one should not question him.
However, the comic's script does not dare to question this aspect within the sphere of religion, but to use the cultural characteristic coming from the Christian imagination to mark Batman's humanity and non-divinity outside the symbolic aspect. Bruce reminds the jury that behind the cowl and mask, the hero is just a man like everyone else in the court. Bruce declares that he placed his faith in Batman, that he prayed and cried out for help, but that he is still waiting, because Batman is not God, he is a man. Batman tries to be God, to be perfect, to be fair and good, but it is impossible. Thee symbol around Batman may represent what God rep- resents to mankind, but Batman in fliesh and blood cannot stand up to it, because Bruce is Batman, and Bruce is just a lost and traumatized man. Judging Mr. Freeze justly also brings Batman salvation, because in this way, he is allowed to make mistakes, and to be human. It is possible for a hero to err and be human, it is possible that he is not perfect. Figure 7. Bruce ends his argument by concluding that Batman is not God. (King & Weeks 2018, p.20) With this narrative gesture, Tom King addresses not only a shifte in Bruce Wayne/Batman's characterization, in which the hero is relieved from the burden he imposed on himself, but also the very notion of the interventionist aspect of messianic superheroes, which through their mythical aspects are allowed to make justice with their own hands, to create their own justice, since all civil institutions are depicted as incapable of disrupting the menaces of evildoers . In Batman #53 the notion of Batman as a failed god should also mean that no individual is above civil society, and that its institutions and law should be preserved in order to avoid authoritarianism.

CONCLUSION
It is undeniable that American comics are an important communication and entertainment tool. Theeir narratives evolved to unite entertainment and impact society culturally, through the propagation of political, religious, moral bias, maintenance of institutions or their modeling with the current culture and morality related to their social and market context. Part of this is expressed in Batman # 53 in the words of Tom King, which delve into the mythological nature of superheroes, but with an interesting focus on Christianity.
Although Batman has always been the most human among the main DC Comics heroes, he still had an aura of infallibility . It is important to remember that in classic stories like Batman: Year One (Miller & Mazzuchelli, 2005), Batman / Bruce Wayne himself publicly takes on the messianic mission of bringing salvation to Gotham City, and in the anticipated future of Kingdom Come  he transforms the city into a utopia/dystopia in which Batman becomes an almost omnipresent and omniscient being, remotely controlling robots with design inspired by his own which monitor and ficght crime in all its forms. In the Tower of Babel arc , it is revealed that Batman extended this control craze even to his meta-human peers, and had created contingency plans to neutralize each of them in case any of them turned against humanity -on their own ill or under someone ease's control -plans that end up being stolen by the villain Ra's Al Ghul and effeectively used against those superheroes.
Theerefore, Batman has the absolute conficdence of the readers and the citizens of Gotham City -he has earned that trust afteer so many acts of heroism and offeering salvation to the weak and innocent, but the hero himself, under his alias, asks for the people of Gotham to stop adoring him to that extent. Tom King's narrative is very much focused on how Batman's perception is related not only to a messianic image, but as God. Thee symbolic equivalent of the Judo-Christian God, Jehovah. Like him, Batman is also feared, respected, adored, trustworthy, and exalted as someone beyond the whole city. Batman is the one who saves, who punishes, who brings hope and never makes a mistake. Theerefore, the contrast between Batman's divine ficgure carries, along with his extreme human nature, weak, fliawed and fragile, show how the hero is liable to error, and readers can identify with that. Batman's admission of this aspect, in his Bruce Wayne persona, gives a new psychological dimension to the hero, who had the messianic determination to save Gotham, as well as a control craze -of society and the superhero community itself -as determinant aspects of his personality in the last decades .