Public Response to Government Information on Weibo

Abstract views: 25
Galleys Downloads: 15 Galleys Downloads: 5


Sina Weibo
Crisis Communication
Public Online Contestation
Risk Governance

How to Cite

Chen, L., & Xu, N. (2023). Public Response to Government Information on Weibo. Galactica Media: Journal of Media Studies, 5(3), 55-78.


Sina Weibo, a popular social media platform in China, plays a crucial role in crisis communication. During the 2018 Shouguang flood, the public criticized the government’s delayed, insufficient, and inaccurate information on Weibo, leading to tension between the public and the government. We interviewed 33 Weibo users to understand their experiences in challenging the government’s flood-related information. Key areas of contention included the timing of information release, the portrayal of the crisis, and the government’s role as the primary crisis manager. When the government’s information fails to meet public expectations, it can lead to online discussions that undermine trust. This article delves into theterritory of crisis communication by examining how public online debates evolve in a state-controlled online setting, specifically in China. We propose that diverse interpretations of crisis information serve as a tool to enhance collective crisis response, thereby reducing conflicts among stakeholders.


Alexander, D. E. (2014). Social media in disaster risk reduction and crisis management. Science and Engineering Ethics, 20, 717–733.

Beaudoin, C. E. (2007). SARS news coverage and its determinants in China and the US. International Communication Gazette, 69(6), 509–524.

Benney, J., & Xu, J. (2018). The decline of Sina Weibo: A technological, political and market analysis. In K. Eills, M. Kent, & J. Xu (Eds.), Chinese Social Media: Social, Cultural and Political Implications (pp. 221–235). Routledge.

Chatfield, A. T., & Reddick, C. G. (2018). All hands‐on deck to tweet# sandy: Networked governance of citizen coproduction in turbulent times. Government Information Quarterly, 35(2), 259–272.

Cheng, Y. (2020). The social-mediated crisis communication research: Revisiting dialogue between organizations and publics in crises of China. Public Relations Review, 46(1), 101769.

China Country Report. (2019). Freedom House.

Cunningham, J. A., Menter, M., & O’Kane, C. (2018). Value Creation in the Quadruple Helix: A Micro Level Conceptual Model of Principal Investigators as Value Creators. R&D Management, 48(1), 136–147.

Feldman, M. S., & Khademian, A. M. (2007). The Role of the Public Manager in Inclusion: Creating Communities of Participation. Governance, 20, 305–324.

Floods hit Shouguang, Shandong province, China’s “hometown of vegetables”. The public questioned the man-made factor (洪灾冲击中国“蔬菜之乡”山东寿光 公众质疑人祸因素). (2018). BBC. (In Chinese).

Gallagher, M., & Miller, B. (2020). Who not what: The logic of China’s information control strategy. China Quarterly, 1–26.

Gambetta, D. (1988). Can we trust trust? In D. Gambetta (Ed.), Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations (pp. 213–237). Blackwell.

Gueorguiev, D., Shao, L., & Crabtree, C. (2017). Blurring the Lines: Uncertainty and Self-Censorship in China.

Hsu, C. (2011). Even further beyond civil society: The rise of Internet-oriented Chinese NGOs. Journal of Civil Society, 7(1), 123–127.

Johnson, T. (2013). The politics of waste incineration in Beijing: The limits of a top-down approach? Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 15(1), 109–128.

Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53, 59–68.

Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734.

Medaglia, R., & Zhu, D. (2017). Public deliberation on government-managed social media: A study on Weibo users in China. Government Information Quarterly, 34(3), 533–544.

Nip, J. Y., & Fu, K. W. (2016). Challenging official propaganda? Public opinion leaders on Sina Weibo. The China Quarterly, 225, 122–144.

Noesselt, N. (2014). Microblogs and the adaptation of the Chinese party-state’s governance strategy. Governance, 27(3), 449–468.

Palen, L., Vieweg, S., Liu, S., & Hughes, A. (2009). Crisis in a networked world: Features of computer mediated communication. Social Science Computing Review, 27(4), 467–480.

Popa, E. O., Blok, V., & Wesselink, R. (2020). A processual approach to friction in quadruple helix collaborations. Science and Public Policy, 47(6), 876–889.

Purohit, H., Castillo, C., Diaz, F., Sheth, A., & Meier, P. (2014). Emergency-relief coordination on social media: Automatically matching resource requests and offers. First Monday, 19.

Qin, B., Strömberg, D., & Wu, Y. (2017). Why Does China Allow Freer Social Media? Protests versus Surveillance and Propaganda. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(1), 117–140.

Rauchfleisch, A., & Schäfer, M. S. (2015). Multiple public spheres of Weibo: A typology of forms and potentials of online public spheres in China. Information, Communication & Society, 18(2), 139‑155.

Roberts, N. (2004). Public deliberation in an age of direct citizen participation. The American Review of Public Administration, 34(4), 315–353.

Schlaeger, J., & Jiang, M. (2014). Official microblogging and social management by local governments in China. China Information, 28(2), 189–213.

Sullivan, J. (2013). China’s Weibo: Is faster different? New Media and Society, 16(1), 24–37.

Tong, J., & Zuo, L. (2014). Weibo communication and government legitimacy in China: A computer-assisted analysis of Weibo messages on two ‘mass incidents’. Information, Communication & Society, 17(1), 66–85.

Tricker, R. (1988). Information resource management—A cross-cultural perspective. Information and Management, 15(1), 37–46.

Tyfield, D. (2018). Liberalism 2.0 and the rise of China: Global crisis, innovation and urban mobility (Routledge advances in sociology). Routledge.

Van den Berg, A. (2021). Participation in Online Platforms: Examining Variations in Intention to Participate across Citizens from Diverse Sociodemographic Groups. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 4(3), 259–276.

Van den Berg, A., Giest, S. N., Groeneveld, S. M., & Kraaij, W. (2020). Inclusivity in online platforms: Recruitment strategies for improving participation of diverse sociodemographic groups. Public Administration Review, 80(6), 989–1000.

Wang, Q. (2018). Does the Chinese government engage in online public debates? A case study of political communications around the building of an oil refinery in Kunming, China. Global Media and China, 3(3), 158–176.

Xiao, Q. (2011). The battle for the Chinese internet. Journal of Democracy, 22(2), 47–61.

Xinhua. (2016). Investigation report on the “8-12” dangerous goods warehouse accident at Tianjin Port released (天津港”8·12”瑞海公司危险品仓库特别重大火灾爆炸事故调查报告公布). (In Chinese).

Yang, G. (2003). The Internet and Civil Society in China: A Preliminary Assessment. Journal of Contemporary China, 12(36), 453–475.

Zheng, Y., & Wu, G. (2005). Information technology, public space, and collective action in China. Comparative Political Studies, 38(5), 507–536.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.