Refik Anadol’s AI-Based Digital Art and Its Intellectual Connotations
pdf
html

Keywords

Digital Art Data Visualization Artificial Intelligence Machine Learning Refik Anadol

How to Cite

Oktan, A., & Akyol Oktan, K. (2024). Refik Anadol’s AI-Based Digital Art and Its Intellectual Connotations. Galactica Media: Journal of Media Studies, 6(3), 17-43. https://doi.org/10.46539/gmd.v6i3.478

Abstract

This article delves into the digital art produced by the internationally renowned Turkish artist Refik Anadol and his team, emerging at the intersection of diverse disciplines such as mathematics, physics, computer science, and aesthetics, within the context of its intellectual connotations. This qualitative study encompasses 26 projects featured on the Refik Anadol Studio’s website. In addition to the projects, we utilize as data sources the videos, visuals and texts that are available on the website, Anadol’s social media posts, audience comments, interviews, academic articles, and news and critiques related to his works. We analyze the works in the context of the artistic creation process, the nature of the technological collaboration, the relationship established with memory, time, space and audience, particularly in the context of the meanings they signify, and we assess the data we obtain along with their philosophical connections. In short, Anadol transforms public data such as images, sounds, and social media posts that constitute collective memory into art with the aid of digital technology capabilities, especially artificial intelligence, creating in these works molecular, fluid, transient intermediate spaces by superimposing different temporal and spatial layers, images, and realities. Through art, he opens up for discussion questions such as what is the position of the artist in the age of artificial intelligence; how art can help us understand the relationship between the virtual and the real; and what it means to experience memory in the digital age. The heterotopic spaces he constructs in his works offer utopian imagery which suggests a life based on peace, optimism, and relationship shared among humans, nature, and other forms of existence.

https://doi.org/10.46539/gmd.v6i3.478
pdf
html

References

Akbulut, K. K. (2021). Medya sanatı, teknoloji devleri, formalizm tartışmaları ve eleştiriler: Refik Anadol’la konuştuk [Media art, technology giants, formalism debates and criticism: We talked to Refik Anadol]. Argonotlar [Argonauts]. https://argonotlar.com/refik-anadol/ (In Turkish)

Akpınar, A. (2022). Sanat Yapıtında Gerçek Nesneden Uzaklaşma Sürecinde Teknolojinin Rolü ve Dijital Sanat Nesnesi [The Role of Technology in the Divergence Process From Real Object in the Artwork and the Digital Art Object]. Art Vision, 28(48), 101–109. https://doi.org/10.54614/ArtVis.2022.1030400 (In Turkish)

Altıntaş, G. (2009). İnsan – Kuru Rüyalar Âlemi [Human—The Realm of Dry Dreams]. In F. Yücel (Ed.), Reha Erdem Sineması: Aşk ve İsyan [Reha Erdem Cinema: Love and Rebellion] (pp. 49–72). Çitlembik. (In Turkish).

Anadol, R. (2020a). Art in the Age of Machine Intelligence. Ted. https://www.ted.com/talks/refik_anadol_art_in_the_age_of_machine_intelligence

Anadol, R. (2020b). Synaesthetic Architecture: A Building Dreams. Architectural Design, 90(3), 76–85. https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.2572

Anadol, R. (2021a). Refik Anadol ile Söyleşi [Interview with Refik Anadol]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aAt2l1TCwA8 (In Turkish)

Anadol, R. (2021b). Sanat Sohbetleri Özel Bölüm [Art Talks Special Section]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MkkyBIfE06c (In Turkish)

Anadol, R. (2021c). Sanatın Dönüşümü [The Transformation of Art]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4j09jfe5-k (In Turkish)

Anadol, R. (2022). Space in the Mind of a Machine: Immersive Narratives. Architectural Design, 92(3), 28–37. https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.2810

Avcı, P. (2021). Medya Sanatçısı Refik Anadol [Media Artist Refik Anadol]. Yeditepe Fatih. https://yeditepefatih.com/2021/nisan-mayis-haziran/medya-sanatcisi-refik-anadol/ (In Turkish)

Baca, M., Helmreich, A., & Gill, M. (2019). Digital Art History. Visual Resources, 35(1–2), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973762.2019.1556887

Batista, H. R., & Hagler, J. (2022). Humans and Machines: A Study of the Impacts of the Technological Advances in the Light of Generative Art Theory. ISEA, International Symposium on Electronic Art, 532–538.

Bentkowska-Kafel, A., Cashen, T., & Gardiner, H. (Eds.). (2005). Digital art history: A subject in transition. Intellect.

Bi̇Çer Olgun, H., & Olgun, C. K. (2020). Çağdaş Sanat veya Öznesini Yitiren Sanat: Sanatçının Ölümü [Contemporary art or art that lose its subject: The death of the artist]. Adıyaman University Journal of Social Sciences, 36, 316–354. https://doi.org/10.14520/adyusbd.796203 (In Turkish)

Bingöl, M., Çevik, N., & Kayahan, Z. (2020). Çağdaş Sanatta Değişen Mekân Algısı Ve Sanatçı-İzleyici Etkileşimleri [Changing Perception of Space in Contemporary Art and Artist-Audience Interactions]. Journal of Academic Social Research, 8(108), 379–393. https://doi.org/10.29228/ASOS.45183 (In Turkish)

Bourriaud, N. (2005). İlişkisel Estetik [Relational Aesthetics] (S. Özen, Trans.). Bağlam Press. (In Turkish).

Bowen, T. (2003). Making Art In A Digital/Cyber Culture: Exploring The Dialectic Between The Manual Creator And The Digital Self. Digital Creativity, 14(4), 219–227. https://doi.org/10.1076/digc.14.4.219.27876

Çelenk, A., & Kurak Açıcı, F. (2022). Tasarımda Yeni Yaklaşımlar: Refik Anadol Ve Makine Hatıraları [New Approaches in Design: Refik Anadol and Machine Memories]. Academic Art, 17, 73-86. (In Turkish).

Deleuze, G. (2013). Müzakereler [Negotiations] (İ. Uysal, Trans.). Norgunk Press. (In Turkish).

Denson, S. (2023). From sublime awe to abject cringe: On the embodied processing of AI art. Journal of Visual Culture, 22(2), 146–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/14704129231194136

Fernandes-Marcos, A., Branco, P., & Zagalo, N. (2009). The Creation Process in Digital Art. In Handbook of Multimedia for Digital Entertainment and Arts (pp. 601–615). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-89024-1_27

Fitzpatrick, K. R. (2019). Studio Visit: Artist Refik Anadol. Cool Hunting. https://coolhunting.com/culture/studio-visit-artist-refik-anadol/

Foucault, M. (1997). Of Other Spaces: Utopias and Heterotopias. In N. Leach (Ed.), Rethinking Architecture: A Reader in Cultural Theory (pp. 350–356). Routledge.

Foucault, M. (2002). The Order of Things. Routledge.

Georgescu Paquin, A. (2019). Public Data Art’s Potential For Digital Placemaking. Tourism and Heritage Journal, 1, 32–48. https://doi.org/10.1344/THJ.2019.1.3

Gökçe Özdamar, E. (2023). A Neuroarchitectural Perspective To Immersive Architectural Environments. Technoetic Arts, 21(1), 35–51. https://doi.org/10.1386/tear_00107_1

Goodchild, P. (2005). Deleuze ve Guattari: Arzu Politikasına Giriş [Deleuze and Guattari: Introduction to the Politics of Desire] (R. G. Öğdül, Trans.). Ayrıntı Press. (In Turkish).

Gözeyik, D. (2023). Kültür Endüstrisi Bağlamında Yapay Zekânın Sanata Etkileri [Effects of Artificial Intelligence on Art in the Context of Culture Industry]. 93–95.

Grau, O. (2021). Digital Art’s Political Impact: Time for Hard Humanities. In O. Grau & I. Hinterwaldner (Eds.), Retracing Political Dimensions: Strategies in Contemporary New Media Art (pp. 34–52). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110670981-003

Hutson, J., & Harper-Nichols, M. (2023). Generative AI and Algorithmic Art: Disrupting the Framing of Meaning and Rethinking the Subject- Object Dilemma. Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology: D, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.34257/GJCSTDVOL23IS1PG55

Jääskeläinen, P., Pargman, D., & Holzapfel, A. (2022, June 21). On the Environmental Sustainability of AI Art(s). Eighth Workshop on Computing within Limits 2022. Eighth Workshop on Computing within Limits 2022. https://doi.org/10.21428/bf6fb269.c46375fa

Kang, K. H. A. (2019). Amplifying the collective (data) body: Screens as relational interfaces in the works of Krzysztof Wodiczko and Refik Anadol. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies 2019 Conference - Fluid Circuits: Cultures of Knowledge After the Digital Turn. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies 2019 Conference - Fluid Circuits: Cultures of Knowledge After the Digital Turn. https://dr.ntu.edu.sg/handle/10356/147731

Karadağ, İ. (2014). Yaratıcılık ve Öznellik [Creativity and Subjectivity]. In A. M. Aytaç & M. Demirtaş (Eds.), Nomadic Thinking. Metis. (In Turkish).

Kılıçoğlu, B., & Kahraman, M. E. (2022). Sanat Ve İzleyici Deneyimi Üzerine Bir Araştırma: “Makine Hatıraları: Uzay” Sergisi Örneği [A Research on Art and Audience Experience: The Case of “Machine Memories: Space” Exhibition]. İdil Sanat ve Dil Dergisi [Idil Art and Language Magazine], 93, 745-759. (In Turkish).

Klinke, H. (2020). The Digital Transformation of Art History. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429505188-5

Lossin, R. H. (2023). Refik Anadol’s “Unsupervised.” E- Flux Criticism. https://www.e-flux.com/criticism/527236/refik-anadol-s-unsupervised

Manovich, L. (2018). AI Aesthetics. Strelka Press.

Notaro, A. (2020). State of the Art: A.I. through the (artificial) artist’s eye. Proceedings of EVA London 2020, 322–328. https://doi.org/10.14236/ewic/EVA2020.58

Oktan, A., & Çon, G. B. (2021). Posthuman Subjectivity and Implied Dreams in Animation Cinema. SineFilozofi, 6(11), 792–811.

Oliveira, A. M. (2022). Future Imaginings in Art and Artificial Intelligence. Journal of Aesthetics and Phenomenology, 9(2), 209–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/20539320.2022.2150467

Özel Sağlamtimur, Z. (2010). Dijital Sanat [Digital Art]. Anadolu University Journal of Social Sciences, 10(3), 213-238. (In Turkish).

Özkanlı, Ü. (2023). Yeni Medya Sanatında Soyut Verileri Akışkan Formda Görselleştirme [Visualizing Abstract Data in Fluid Form in New Media Art]. MAS JAPS, 8(1), 183-191. (In Turkish).

Özselçuk, S. (2023). A Critical Review On The Use Of Artificial Intelligence Algorithms In The Context Of Digital Art: Refik Anadol’s “Machine Memoirs: Space” Exhibition. International Journal of Economic and Administrative Academic Research, 3(1), 1–21.

Parisi, L. (2019). The alien subject of AI. Subjectivity, 12(1), 27–48. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41286-018-00064-3

Paul, C. (2008). Digital Art/Public Art: Governance and Agency in the Networked Commons. In C. Sommerer, L. C. Jain, & L. Mignonneau (Eds.), The Art and Science of Interface and Interaction Design (pp. 163–185). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79870-5_11

Riefe, J. (2019). Buildings that Dream: Inside the Mind of a Revolutionary Digital Artist. Art & Object. https://www.artandobject.com/news/buildings-dream-inside-mind-revolutionary-digital-artist

Ruşen, F. (2022). Etkileşimli Ortam İçerisinde Seyircinin Katılımı ve Aura Kavramı [Audience Participation and Aura Concept in Interactive Environment]. Tykhe Sanat ve Tasarım Dergisi [Tykhe Art and Design Journal], 7(13), 182–196. https://doi.org/10.55004/tykhe.1106073 (In Turkish)

Simonite, T. (2020). Artist Refik Anadol Turns Data Into Art, With Help From AI. Wired. https://www.wired.com/story/artist-refik-anadol-turns-data-art-help-ai/

Singh, G. (2020). Machine, Perchance to Dream. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 40(5), 5–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCG.2020.3012336

Sönmez, A. (2021). Refik Anadol’un Makine Hatıraları’nın Hatırlattıkları -4 [Refik Anadol’s Machine Memories -4]. Sanatatak. http://www.sanatatak.com/refik-anadolun-makine-hatiralarinin-hatirlattiklari-4/ (In Turkish)

Stavrides, S. (2016). Kentsel Heterotopya: Özgürleşme Mekânı Olarak Eşikler Kentine Doğru [Urban Heterotopia: Towards the City of Thresholds as a Space of Liberation] (A. Karatay, Trans.). Sel. (In Turkish).

Stern, N. (2011). The Implicit Body as Performance: Analyzing Interactive Art. Leonardo, 44(3), 233–238. https://doi.org/10.1162/LEON_a_00168

Tire, S. (2022). Verileri Yapay Zekâyla Sanata Dönüştüren Sanatçı Refik Anadol [Artist Refik Anadol Transforming Data Into Art With Artificial Intelligence]. Social Science Development Journal, 7(30), 69–80. https://doi.org/10.31567/ssd.607 (In Turkish)

Winter, D. (2024). Aesthetic Aspects of Digital Humanism: An Aesthetic-Philosophical Analysis of Whether AI Can Create Art. In H. Werthner, C. Ghezzi, J. Kramer, J. Nida-Rümelin, B. Nuseibeh, E. Prem, & A. Stanger (Eds.), Introduction to Digital Humanism (pp. 211–224). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45304-5_14

Xiaoling, D. (2023). Refik Anadol’s Construction Of Space And Time: Synesthesia Between Machines And Humans. Proceeding of the International Conference on Arts and Humanities, 9(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.17501/23572744.2022.9101

Xu, C. (2020). Algorithmic Art: Beyond the Artist. Illumine Magazine. https://illumin.usc.edu/algorithmic-art-beyond-the-artist/

Zylinska, J. (2020). AI Art, Machine Visions and Warped Dreams. Open Humanities Press.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.