Abstract
In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) has been actively integrated into everyday human life. Its popularity continues to grow steadily, and companies increasingly employ AI to optimize and accelerate workflows. Ordinary users leverage large language models (LLMs) and multimodal AI systems to perform a wide range of tasks, including generating texts, images, and videos; planning their daily schedules; and searching for information, among others. The rapid integration of AI into diverse spheres of human activity gives rise to a number of fundamental challenges such as the simulation of meaning, the substitution of human will, and other issues that threaten personal identity and autonomy. An increasing number of cognitive and creative functions – such as text generation, decision-making, and reflection – are being delegated by humans to AI systems. Consequently, it becomes critically important to explicitly identify and articulate the problems emerging from human–AI interaction and to develop ethically and cognitively sound frameworks for such interaction. This article examines current trends and key challenges associated with the integration of AI into everyday life. It introduces the concept of “meaning simulation” – a phenomenon whereby AI models function as simulacra of meaning, creating an illusion of understanding, thought, and meaning. The paper proposes a conceptual framework for productive human–AI collaboration and outlines a positive scenario for its implementation. This article will be of interest to researchers and professionals working in artificial intelligence, philosophy of science and technology, cognitive science, as well as to anyone concerned with contemporary technological trends and their social, ethical, and existential implications.
References
Jones, C. R., & Bergen, B. K. (2025). Large Language Models Pass the Turing Test (Version 1). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2503.23674
Mejias, U. A., & Couldry, N. (2019). Datafication. Internet Policy Review, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.14763/2019.4.1428
Shrivastava, Dr. A. (2024). Artificial Intelligence (AI): Evolution, Methodologies, and Applications. International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology, 12(4), 5501–5505. https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2024.61241
Turing, A. M. (1950). Computing Machinery and Intelligence. Mind, 59, 433–460. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/LIX.236.433
Van Der Weel, F. R. (Ruud), & Van Der Meer, A. L. H. (2024). Handwriting but not typewriting leads to widespread brain connectivity: A high-density EEG study with implications for the classroom. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1219945. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1219945
Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, Ł. ukasz, & Polosukhin, I. (2017). Attention is All you Need. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30. https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2017/hash/3f5ee243547dee91fbd053c1c4a845aa-Abstract.html
Welsh, R. (2019). Defining Artificial Intelligence. SMPTE Motion Imaging Journal, 128(1), 26–32. https://doi.org/10.5594/JMI.2018.2880366
Zohuri, B. (2023). Artificial Super Intelligence (ASI) The Evolution of AI Beyond Human Capacity. Current Trends in Engineering Science (CTES), 3(6), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.54026/CTES/1049
Zou, X. (2024). A Review of the Latest Research Achievements in the Basic Theory of Generative AI and Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). Computer Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.57237/j.cst.2024.03.004
Безлепкин, Н. (2023). Славянофильское учение о языке и немецкая наука и философия. Философский полилог, 1, 37–50. https://doi.org/10.31119/phlog.2023.1.188
Бодрийяр, Ж. (2015). Симулякры и симуляции (А. Качалов, Пер.). Издательский дом «ПОСТУМ».
Капп, Э. (1925). Органическая проекция. В И. С. Плотников (Ред.), Роль орудия в развитии человека (сс. 38–41). Прибой.
Кравец, А. В. (2024). Интеллектуальная техника и угрозы для субъектности человека. Философские науки, 67(3), 123–141. https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2024-67-3-123-141
Латыпова, А. Р. (2020). Между метафорой и глитчем: Цифровая эволюция медиа. Эпистемология и философия науки, 57(2), 162–178. https://doi.org/10.5840/eps202057228
Микритумов, И. Б., Муравьева, Л. Е., & Тульчинский, Г. Л. (2023). Смысл и смыслообразование: Факторы, практики, акторы. Вопросы философии, 2, 215–220. https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2023-2-215-220
Очеретяный, К. А. (2024). Призрак в кармане: Медиаархеология тамагочи. Galactica Media: Journal of Media Studies, 6(2), 260–276. https://doi.org/10.46539/gmd.v6i2.492
Прись, И. (2024). О логицизме А.И. Введенского. Философский полилог, 1–2. https://doi.org/10.31119/phlog.2024.1-2.217
Пружинин, Б. И., Бендерский, И. И., Воробьева, О. В., Долгова, Е. А., Малинов, А. В., Микешина, Л. А., Мотовникова, Е. Н., Ольхов, П. А., Хвостова, К. В., & Щедрина, Т. Г. (2017). Философско-методологические проекты русских историков и современные проблемы методологии исторического познания. К 180-летию В. И. Герье. Вопросы философии, 9, 24–61.
Розин, В. М. (2024). Может ли искусственный интеллект подчинить человека? Философские науки, 67(3), 7–26. https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2024-67-3-7-26
Славин, Б. Б. (2024). Искусственный интеллект как фактор трансформации государства и общества: Поиск баланса между управленческой эффективностью и человекоориентированностью. Философские науки, 67(3), 99–122. https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2024-67-3-99-122
Тульчинский, Г. Л. (2019). Практическая философия смысла. Личность. Культура. Общество, 21(1–2), 183–196. https://doi.org/10.30936/1606-951X-2019-21-1/2-183-196
Тульчинский, Г. Л. (2021). Человек-машина и машина-человек в искусстве: Встреча в цифре. Художественная культура, 3, 112–127. https://doi.org/10.51678/2226-0072-2021-3-112-127
Тьюринг, А. (1960). Может ли машина мыслить? (С. А. Яновская, Ред.; Ю. А. Данилов, Пер.). Государственное издательство физико-математической литературы.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

