Contested Identities: Exploring the Cultural, Historical and Political Complexities of the ‘Three Chinas’. Translated into Russian by O. S. Yakushenkova
pdf (Русский)

Keywords

National Cinema, Three Chinas, Chineseness, Cultural affinity

How to Cite

Li, Q., & Jennings, R. (2019). Contested Identities: Exploring the Cultural, Historical and Political Complexities of the ‘Three Chinas’. Translated into Russian by O. S. Yakushenkova. Galactica Media: Journal of Media Studies, 1(2), 169-200. https://doi.org/10.24411/2658-7734-2019-10018

Abstract

When facing the political, historical and cultural complexities of Mainland China, Hong Kong and Taiwan, problematic issues arise in relation to understanding the sorts of national/cultural identities that might be projected by them. With regard to these three Chinese language cinemas, a traditional national cinema approach focussing predominantly upon nation-state as a source of meaning would provide only a limited understanding of the meanings generated. This article, however, draws on what Benedict Anderson (1991) put forward as the theory of ‘Imagined Communities’ which assumes a large body of people regard themselves as members of a ‘nation’ (and here we interpret this term broadly and beyond understandings of geographical borders and political systems) through a variety of historical legacies, cultural memories and acts of consumption. In this article we hold the assumption that there is a shared cultural meaning (namely ‘Chineseness’) that extends across the three Chinese language cinemas and consider cultural affinity as greater than national and political boundaries.

https://doi.org/10.24411/2658-7734-2019-10018
pdf (Русский)

References

Anderson, B. (1991). Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.

Appadurai, A. (1996). Disjuncture and Difference in the Global Cultural Economy. In Global Culture: Nationalism, Globalisation and Modernity, ed. M. Featherstone, London: Sage.

Berry, C. & Farquhar, A. M. (1999). An Analysis of Yellow Earth and Black Canon Incident. In C. E. Linda & D. Desser (ed.), Cinematic Landscapes. Texas: University of Texas Press.

Berry, C. (2011). Transnational Chinese Cinema Studies. In S. H. Lim & J. Ward (Eds.), The Chinese Cinema Book (pp. 9-16). British Film Institute.

Betz, M. (2009). Beyond the Subtitle: Remapping European Art Cinema. University of Minnesota Press.

Chow, R., (1995). Primitive Passions, Visuality, Sexuality, Ethnography, and Contemporary Chinese Cinema. New York: Columbia University Press.

Chu, Y. H. (2004). Taiwan’s National Identity Politics and the Prospect of Cross-strait Relations. Asian Survey, 44(4), 484-512.

Confucius (1996). The Analects. Hertfordshire: Wordsworth Editions Limited.

Crofts, S (1998). Concepts of National Cinema. In J. Hill & P. C. Gibson (Eds.), The Oxford Guide to Film Studies (pp. 385-94). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Faulkner, C. (1994). Affective Identities: French National Cinema and the 1930s.Canadian Journal of Film Studies, (3), 2:3-24.

Hall, S. (2004). Cultural Identity and Cinematic Representation. In P. Simpson, A. Utterson & K. J. Shepheroson (Eds.), Critical Concepts in Media and Cultural Studies (pp. 386-97). London: Routledge.

Hayward, S. (1993). French National Cinema. New York, Routledge.

Higbee, W. & Lim, S. H. (2010). Concepts of Transnational Cinema: Towards a Critical Transnationalism in Film Studies’. Transnational Cinemas, 1(1), 7-21.

Higson, A. (2002). The Concept of National Cinema. In C. Fowler (Eds.), European Cinema Reader (pp.132-42). Routledge.

Higson, A. (2006). The Limiting Imagination of National Cinema. In E. Ezra & T. Rowden (Eds.), Transnational Cinema (p.18). Routledge.

Hobsbawm, E. (2012). The Invention of Tradition. Cambridge University Press, Reissue edition.

Lao Tzu (1997). Taoism. Cumberland, Wordsworth Editions Limited.

Liu, F. C. S. & Lee, F. L. F. (2013). Country, National, and Pan-national Identification in Taiwan and Hong Kong: Standing Together as Chinese? Asian Survey, 53(6), 1112-1134.

Lu, S. H. (1997). Transnational Chinese Cinema. University of Hawaii Press.

Madsen, R. (1998). China’s Catholics: Tragedy and Hope in an Emerging Civil Society. California: University of California Press.

Orr J. (1993), Cinema and Modernity, Cambridge: Policy Press.

Park, M. & Chesla, C. (2007). Revisiting Confucianism as a Conceptual Framework for Asian Family Study. Journal of Family Nursing. Retrieved from http://jfn.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/13/3/293

Schubert, G. (2004). Taiwan’s Politics Parties and National Identity. Asian Survey, 53(6), 534-554.

Strother, S. & Strother, B. (2006). Moon Living Abroad in China. Avalon Travel Publishing.

Vincendeau, G. (2001). Film/Literature/Heritage. London, British Film Institute.

Vitali, V. & Willemen, P. (2006). Theorising National Cinema. London, BFI Publishing.

Yau, E. C. M., (2006). "Yellow Earth" Western Analysis and a Non-Western Text. In D. Eleftheriois & G. H. Needham (Eds.), Asian Cinemas: A Reader and Guide. University of Hawaii Press.

Yeh, E. Y. & Davis, D. W. (2008). Re-nationalizing China’s Film Industry: Case Study on the China Film Group and Film Marketization. Journal of Chinese Cinema, 2(1), 37-51.

Yueh, Y. (1998). Defining “Chinese”. Jump Cut, 42:73-6. Retrieved from http://www.ejumpcut.org/archive/onlinpapers/JC42folder/DefiningChinese.html

Zhang, Y. J. (2004). Chinese National Cinema. London and New York: Routledge.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.