Analysis of Profiles of Supporters of Conspiracy Narratives about Vaccination Against COVID-19 on a Social Network
pdf (Русский)
html (Русский)

Keywords

VK User Profile Digital Portrait Socio-Demographic Portrait Conspiracy Theory Conspiracy Narrative Vaccine Hesitancy Anti-Vaxxer Conspiracy Thinking COVID-19 Big Data

How to Cite

Sarkisova, A., Dunaeva, D., Petrov, E., & Voronov, A. (2024). Analysis of Profiles of Supporters of Conspiracy Narratives about Vaccination Against COVID-19 on a Social Network. Galactica Media: Journal of Media Studies, 6(3), 199-223. https://doi.org/10.46539/gmd.v6i3.505

Abstract

The article analyzes the socio-demographic characteristics and value-worldview self-positioning of the distributors of conspiracy narratives (“conspiracy theories”) about vaccination against COVID-19 on the Russian social network “VK”. The research material consists of 33,674 profiles of VK users who published at least two messages during the pandemic that explicate the stated narrative. The collection and analysis of the material was carried out using big data analysis technologies. The purpose of the study is to determine whether it is possible to identify typical socio-demographic and ideological traits of anti-vaccer conspiracy theorists, which to a certain extent explain their penchant for conspiracy thinking. The results obtained refute the marginal dominance of conspiracy theorists in a pandemic situation. Versions popular in the scientific literature about the predominance of insufficiently educated people among “conspiracy theorists”, or the elderly as more gullible, or women as more suggestible, or residents of villages and small provincial towns as more conservative, etc. are not confirmed by the large-scale empirical studies of large user data. The results of the study may be useful for developing countermeasures and strategies to address public mistrust of institutions and official trends in public health, in particular vaccination policies. The traditional focus on information and educational measures (explanations about the dangers of the disease and the benefits of the vaccine) seems to be ineffective in the context of the emergence of value systems, cognitive distortions, general socio-political tension and other reasons that are still awaiting serious study.

https://doi.org/10.46539/gmd.v6i3.505
pdf (Русский)
html (Русский)

References

A conspiracy theory against Russia. (n. d.). VCIOM News. https://wciom.ru/index.php?id=236&uid=9259 (In Russian).

Afanasyeva, Yu. A., Sokolov, B. O., & Shirokanova, A. A. (2023). Factors of COVID-19-Skepticism in Russia: Evidence from Two Waves of the “Values in Crisis” Longitudinal Survey. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes, 5, 115–137. https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2023.5.2375 (In Russian).

Aksenov, V. B. (2022). Conspiracy in Modern Russia: Paranoia, Technology, Culture? Reviewed In: Yablokov I. Russian Culture of Conspiracy. Conspiracy Theories in Post-Soviet Space. Translated from English: Alpina Non-Fiction, 2020. 430 С. Herald of Tver State University. Series: History, 2(62), 169–182. https://doi.org/10.26456/vthistory/2022.2.169-182 (In Russian).

Ananyan, S. M., Sazonov, D. S., Slynko, Y. N., & Solomatin, E. B. (2023). PolyAnalyst analytical platform: Architecture, functionality, application practice. Hotline – Telecom. (In Russian).

Ardashev, R. G. (2020a). The Irrationality of Public Opinion: Fears of Interaction With Government Representatives. Mission Confessions, 9(3), 340–344. (In Russian).

Ardashev, R. G. (2020b). Conspiracy Theories in the Public Opinion of Russians. Mission Confessions, 9(1), 145–154. (In Russian).

Arteev, S. P. (2022). COVID-19 Pandemic: Conspiracy and Anti-Conspiracy. Vlast’ (The Authority), 30(1), 58–63. https://doi.org/10.31171/vlast.v30i1.8781 (In Russian).

Batanina, I. A., Parma, R. V., Brodovskaya, E. V., & Dombrovskaya, A. Yu. (2022). Portrait of Vaccination Opponents During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Results of Big Data Analysis. Izvestiya Tula State University, 1, 8–18. (In Russian).

Bergen, N., Kirkby, K., Fuertes, C. V., Schlotheuber, A., Menning, L., Mac Feely, S., O’Brien, K., & Hosseinpoor, A. R. (2023). Global State of Education-Related Inequality in COVID-19 Vaccine Coverage, Structural Barriers, Vaccine Hesitancy, and Vaccine Refusal: Findings from the Global COVID-19 Trends and Impact Survey. The Lancet Global Health, 11(2), e207–e217. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00520-4

Daud, A., Li, J., Zhou, L., & Muhammad, F. (2010). Knowledge Discovery Through Directed Probabilistic Topic Models: A Survey. Frontiers of Computer Science in China, 4(2), 280–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11704-009-0062-y

Federal State Statistics Service. (n. d.). https://rosstat.gov.ru/ (In Russian).

Guerin, B., & Miyazaki, Y. (2006). Analyzing Rumors, Gossip, and Urban Legends Through Their Conversational Properties. The Psychological Record, 56(1), 23–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395535

Hofmann, T. (1999). Probabilistic Latent Semantic Indexing. Proceedings of the 22nd Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, 50–57. https://doi.org/10.1145/312624.312649

Hofstadter, R. (1996). The Paranoid Style in American Politics And Other Essays. Harvard University Press.

Kalabikhina, I. E., Kazbekova, Z. G., Banin, E. P., & Klimenko, G. A. (2023). Demographic values and socio-demographic profile of Vkontakte users: is there a connection? Moscow University Bulletin. Series 6. Economics, 58(3), 157–180. https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU0130-0105-6-58-3-8 (In Russian).

Kata, A. (2010). A postmodern Pandora’s Box: Anti-vaccination Misinformation on the Internet. Vaccine, 28(7), 1709–1716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.12.022

Kazun, A. D., & Porshnev, A. V. (2021). Who Believes in Conspiracy Theories? Factors Influencing Propensity for Conspiracy Thinking in Russia, Kazakhstan and Ukraine. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes, 6, 549–565. https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2021.6.1889 (In Russian).

Kirziuk, A. A. (2021). “I Have No Fear”: COVID Skeptics in Search of Agency and Truth. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes, 2, 484–509. https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2021.2.1776 (In Russian).

Kislitsyn, D. V., & Schapov, D. S. (2022). From intention to action: Factors of vaccine hesitancy and vaccine refusal during the COVID-19 pandemic. Population and Economics, 6(4), 162–177. https://doi.org/10.3897/popecon.6.e90723

Lip, A., Pateman, M., Fullerton, M. M., Chen, H. M., Bailey, L., Houle, S., Davidson, S., & Constantinescu, C. (2023). Vaccine Hesitancy Educational Tools for Healthcare Providers and Trainees: A Scoping Review. Vaccine, 41(1), 23–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.09.093

Lyotard, J.-F. (1998). The postmodern condition. Institute of Experimental Sociology; Aleteia. (In Russian).

Petkova, D. (2024). Rumors and Conspiracy Theories in Bulgarian Social Media During COVID-19 Pandemic. Nauchnyi dialog, 13(1), 177–203. https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2024-13-1-177-203 (In Russian).

Petrov, E. Yu., & Sarkisova, A. Yu. (2021). Resource of software platform “Polyanalyst” in social science and humanities research. Open Data - 2021: Forum materials, 94–104. (In Russian).

Prisada, V. S. (2023). Narrativnye strategii konspirologicheskikh teorii v rossiiskom mediaprostranstve. LINGUA-UNIVERSUM, 3, 102–104. (In Russian).

Rovinskaya, T. L. (2021). The Role of New Digital Technologies in a Time of Crisis. World Eсonomy and International Relations, 65(6), 95–106. https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2021-65-6-95-106 (In Russian).

Ryazantsev, S. V., Khramova, M. N., & Smirnov, A. V. (2021). The social demographic aspects of vaccination of population of Russia in the context of COVID-19 pandemic. Probl Sotsialnoi Gig Zdravookhranenniiai Istor Med, 29(5), 1047–1056. https://doi.org/10.32687/0869-866X-2021-29-5-1047-1056 (In Russian).

Sarieva, I. R., & Bogatyreva, N. I. (2021). System Justification and Coronavirus Restrictions Support: the Role of Government Trust and Conspiracy Belief. Social Psychology and Society, 12(3), 59–73. https://doi.org/10.17759/sps.2021120305 (In Russian).

Sarkisova, A. Yu., Petrov, E. Yu., & Dunaeva, D. O. (2023). Development of a System of Linguistic Markers for Automated Unloading of Thematic Text Data From a Social Network. Public Administration. E-journal (Russia), 97, 70–84. https://doi.org/10.24412/2070-1381-2023-97-70-84 (In Russian).

Sergeev, V. N. (2022). Conspiracy trend in everyday practices of social reflection. Theoretical generalisations. Vestnik instituta sotziologii, 13(2), 91–113. https://doi.org/10.19181/vis.2022.13.2.798 (In Russian).

Sokolov, B. O., & Zavadskaya, M. A. (2021). Socio-Demographic Profiles, Personality Traits, Values, and Attitudes of COVID-Skeptics in Russia. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes, 6, 410–435. https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2021.6.1938 (In Russian).

Takagi, M. A., Hess, S., Smith, Z., Gawronski, K., Kumar, A., Horsley, J., Haddad, N., Noveloso, B., Zyzanski, S., & Ragina, N. (2023). The impact of educational interventions on COVID-19 and vaccination attitudes among patients in Michigan: A prospective study. Frontiers in Public Health, 11, 1144659. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1144659

Uglanova, I. L., Mikhaylova, A. M., Belskaya, T. V., & Getman, A. V. (2021). Conspiracy beliefs about vaccination: Questionnaire validation. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Sociology, 14(1), 14–32. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu12.2021.102 (In Russian).

Willis, D. E., Selig, J. P., Andersen, J. A., Hall, S., Hallgren, E., Williams, M., Bryant-Moore, K., & McElfish, P. A. (2023). Hesitant but vaccinated: Assessing COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among the recently vaccinated. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 46(1–2), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-021-00270-6

Zemlyanskiy, A. V. (2021). “Infodemic” Case Study: Conspiracy Theories Around COVID-19 – Spreading and Debunking in the Media. Nauka i shkola, 3, 51–61. https://doi.org/10.31862/1819-463X-2021-3-51-61 (In Russian).

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.