Abstract
The growth of social and political tension in the world, the resonance of global and regional crises and contradictions are preparing new challenges for local linguistic and cultural communities, which are reflected and intensified in network communication. The formation and circulation of conflict-producing content and the use of verbal aggression on social networks can become triggers for ethno-confessional conflicts and provoke aggression and violence. The purpose of the article is to analyze conflict-producing content in the VKontakte communities and Telegram channels of Stavropol, Dagestan and North Ossetia, establish its thematic focus, identify the communication tactics used and speech moves to provoke ethno-confessional conflict. In social networks of the Stavropol region, speech moves are more often used focusing attention on socio-economic difficulties and aimed at creating a hostile attitude towards migrants. In the online discourse of Dagestan, religious themes prevail over ethnic ones, while this factor in determining stratagem-tactical variation helps reduce interethnic and interfaith hostility. The thematic and situational connection of conflict genesis to the initial post suggests that provoking conflict acquires not only an ethnic, but also a confessional character, due to a sense of religious solidarity, and defensive rhetoric in relation to the Islamic way of life and traditions. The analysis of the conflict-producing content of online communities in North Ossetia indicates that there are currently no serious ethnic and religious contradictions, while socio-economic issues are coming to the fore. Significant ethno-confessional and ethnocultural differences, complexities and problems of socio-economic development can turn social networks into an effective tool for the use of manipulative technologies in the course of modern hybrid information warfare. Further research into network discourse will contribute to identifying the conflict-generating potential of verbal aggression and will help to form of effective means of countering the growing threats of destabilization of ethno-confessional relations in the North Caucasus.
References
Avdeev, E. A., Bredikhin, S.N., & Vorobiev, S. M. (2024). Stratagemic and tactical variation in conflictogenic network discourse: glocalization of value space. Current Issues in Philology and Pedagogical Linguistics, 1, 47–62. https://doi.org/10.29025/2079-6021-2024-1-47-62 (In Russian).
Akhremenko, A. S., Stukal, D. K., & Petrov, A. P. (2020). Network vs Message in Protest Diffusion on Social Media: Theoretical and Data Analytics Perspectives. Polis. Political Studies, 2, 73–91. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2020.02.06 (In Russian).
Babosov, E. M. (2019). The role of personality creativity in the development of network society. Belaruskaya dumka Publ. (In Russian).
Benesch, S. (2012). Words as Weapons. World Policy Journal, 29(1), 7–13.
Bredikhin, S. N., & Gasanov, B. V. (2022). To the problem of delimitation of figure and image within political mediadiscourse. Scientific Thought of Caucasus, 1, 110–116. (In Russian).
Bredikhin, S. N., & Pelevina, N. A. (2021). Linguocognitive mechanisms of actualization and conceptualization of idiocomponents of the world picture. Paragraph Publ. (In Russian).
Bredikhina, Y. I. (2023). Anthropocentric and cognitive-communicative bases of delimitation of relevance and pertinence in the discourse of social work. Vestnik Stavropol State Pedagogical Institute, 2, 28–37. (In Russian).
Dijk, T. A. van. (1997). Discourse as Structure and Process. SAGE.
Dmitrieva, A. V. (2018). Communication strategies and tactics in french political advertising videotexts. Communication Studies, 3, 96–113. https://doi.org/10.25513/2413-6182.2018.3.96-113 (In Russian).
Fischer, A. (2022). Then again, what is manipulation? A broader view of a much-maligned concept. Philosophical Explorations, 25(2), 170–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/13869795.2022.2042586
Gabrielova, E. V., Zheltukhina, M. R., Slyshkin, G. G., Shiryaeva, O. V., Volskaya, N. N., & Surikova, T. (2020). Online verbalization of personal assessment: English-language Twitter reactions in the protest political discourse. Astra Salvensis - Revista de Istorie Si Cultura, 8(1), 403–421.
Haider, S., Luceri, L., Deb, A., Badawy, A., Peng, N., & Ferrara, E. (2023). Detecting Social Media Manipulation in Low-Resource Languages. Companion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023, 1358–1364. https://doi.org/10.1145/3543873.3587615
Kinney, T. A. (2008). Hate Speech and Ethnophaulisms. In W. Donsbach (Ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Communication (1st ed.). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405186407.wbiech004
Kozhevnikova, G. (2007). The language of hostility after Kondopoga. In The language of enmity against society (pp. 10-72). Sova Center Publ. (In Russian).
Morozova, E., Miroshnichenko, I., & Ryabchenko, N. (2016). The Frontier of Network Society. World Economy and International Relations, 60(2), 83–97. https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2016-60-2-83-97 (In Russian).
Nybet, T., & Rhoda, K. (2009). Virtual social spaces: Approaches, practices, perspectives. In N. E. Pokrovsky & D. V. Efremenko (Eds.), Sociological Yearbook 2009 (pp. 301-307). Department of General Sociology, GU-HSE. (In Russian).
Popova, O. V. (2021). Online Political Communication of Youth from Russian Megapolises. Galactica Media: Journal of Media Studies, 3(2), 28–54. https://doi.org/10.46539/gmd.v3i2.157 (In Russian).
Pugueva, A. O., & Manaenko, G. N. (2023). Cognitive Style as the Basis for Algorithmization of Verbal-Cognitive Activity in Academic Discourse. Current Issues in Philology and Pedagogical Linguistics, 3, 91–101. https://doi.org/10.29025/2079-6021-2023-3-91-101 (In Russian).
Samarkina, I. (2021). The Political Worldview of VKontakte Communities: The Experience of Analyzing the Subjective Space of Politics in a Network Society. Political Expertise: POLITEX, 17(1), 87‑102. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu23.2021.107 (In Russian).
Schepilova, G. G. (2014). Audience Needs for the Internet and Traditional Media. Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Seriya 10. Zhurnalistika, 5, 46–54. (In Russian).
Semkina, A. V. (2009). Systemic and actualization indicators of the category of approximativity. Language: Multidisciplinarity of scientific knowledge, 1, 146-150. (In Russian).
Skovorodnikov, A. P. (2004). On the necessity of distinguishing the concepts of “rhetorical technique”, “stylistic figure”, “speech tactics”, and “speech genres” in the practice of terminological lexicography. Rhetoric - Linguistics, 5, 5-11. (In Russian).
Tatarnikova, N. M. (2019). Communicative Strategies and Tactics of Incitement of Ethnic Hatred on the Internet. Communication Studies, 6(2), 435–450. https://doi.org/10.25513/2413-6182.2019.6(2).435-450 (In Russian).
Terkulov, V. I. (2024). Linguistic foundations of subethnic, ethnic and ethnopolitical identity. Current Issues in Philology and Pedagogical Linguistics, 1, 36–46. https://doi.org/10.29025/2079-6021-2024-1-36-46 (In Russian).
Zotov, V. V., & Alekseenko, A. I. (2021). Identification of Social Barriers in the EthnoConfessional Space of Public Communication of Border Regions. Communicology, 9(1), 139–150. https://doi.org/10.21453/2311-3065-2021-9-1-139-150 (In Russian).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.