The Era of Messengers: How Compensatory Communication Helps Overcome Challenges of Total Digitalization (the Sociological Research)
PDF (Русский)
HTML (Русский)

Keywords

Digitalization Digital Technologies Messengers Social Networks Virtual Communication Compensatory Communication Compensatory Processes Loneliness Digital Reality Online Communication

How to Cite

Gladyshev, V., Valeeva, E., & Belova, L. (2025). The Era of Messengers: How Compensatory Communication Helps Overcome Challenges of Total Digitalization (the Sociological Research). Galactica Media: Journal of Media Studies, 7(3), 191-214. https://doi.org/10.46539/gmd.v7i3.592

Abstract

Scientists consider communication and loneliness that arise at the mental level as global problems of our time. The article analyzes one of the most common modifications of compensatory communication today – communication in instant messengers and social networks, with the help of which the transformed communicative needs of individuals are satisfied. One of the key objectives of the study was to determine the extent to which real interpersonal contacts are being replaced by  virtual communication among schoolchildren, college students, and university students. For this purpose, an analysis was carried out of the connection between real and virtual space, namely, of the respondents’ social circle and the frequency of their interactions in the real and virtual world. The results of the study show that online communication among the group under consideration is carried out in a mode of direct compensation and does not have a harmful effect on their communication environment. When used judiciously, it is neither a placebo nor a panacea for loneliness, although it would be a mistake to eliminate such a risk.

https://doi.org/10.46539/gmd.v7i3.592
PDF (Русский)
HTML (Русский)

References

Andreeva, G. M., & Janousek, J. (1987). Communication and Optimization of Joint Activity. MSU. (In Russian).

Bakhtin, M. M. (1990). The Creativity of François Rabelais and the Popular Culture of the Middle Ages and Renaissance. Khudozhestvennaya literatura. (In Russian).

Beck, W. (2000). Risk Society: Toward another Modernity. Progress-Tradition. (In Russian).

Bodalev, A. A. (1983). Personality and Communication. Pedagogy. (In Russian).

Buber, M. (1922). I and Thou. (In Russian).

Castells, M. (2004). The Internet Galaxy: Reflections on the Internet, Business and Society. U-Factoria. (In Russian).

Chernykh, S. S., Vodenko, K. V., Kovalenko, A. M., & Chernov, I. V.. (2019). Demonstrative Youth Consumption in the Context of the Expansion of the Information Society and Global Digitalization. Humanities of the South of Russia, 8(5), 179–189. https://doi.org/10.23683/2227-8656.2019.5.15 (In Russian).

Chvanova, M. S., Khramova, M. V., Sletkov, I. A., Kiseleva, I. A., Molchanov, A. A., & Kotova, N. A. (2016). The Research of the Internet on Socials Needs of Users. Tambov University Review: Series Humanities, 21(12), 7–25. https://doi.org/10.20310/1810-0201-2016-21-12(164)-7-25 (In Russian).

Frank, S. L. (1990). The Incomprehensible. Pravda Publ. (In Russian).

Gladyshev, V. I. (1999). Compensatory Communication: A Socio-Philosophical Analysis. Cultural Information Bank. (In Russian).

Gladyshev, V. I., Milyaeva, E. G., & Penner, R. V. (2022). A Person on the Web: Loneliness and Communication. ΠΡΑΞΗMΑ. Journal of Visual Semiotics, 4, 63–81. https://doi.org/10.23951/2312-7899-2022-4-63-81 (In Russian).

Gostev, A. N., & Belous, O. V. (2019). Research of a Modern Communicative Discourse of Users of the Internet Network Within the Reflexive Activity and Structural Theory of Communicative Action of Jurgen Habermas. Digital Sociology, 2(1), 24–30. (In Russian).

Jukova, M. V., & Kryukov, D. V. (2022). Modern Trend in the Development of the Economy and Society: Digital Society as a Special Stage of the Information Society. Society and Security Insights, 5(2), 120–139. https://doi.org/10.14258/ssi(2022)2-08 (In Russian).

Khalin, V. G., & Chernova, G. V. (2018). Digitalization and Its Impact on the Russian Economy and Society: Advantages, Challenges, Threats and Risks. Administrative Consulting, 10, 46–63. https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2018-10-46-63 (In Russian).

Kibakin, M. V., & Grishaeva, S. A. (2019). The Current Problems of the Digital Reflection of Social Reality: Rethinking Scientific Concepts. Digital Sociology, 2(1), 4–9. https://doi.org/10.26425/2658-347X-2019-1-4-9 (In Russian).

Kuznetsov, O. N., & Lebedev, V. I. (1972). Psychology and Psychopathology of Loneliness. Medicine. (In Russian).

Liga, M. B., & Shchetkina, I. A..(2021). A Man in the Era of Digitalization of Society. Humanitarian Vector., 16(2), 29–38. https://doi.org/10.21209/1996-7853-2021-16-2-29-38 (In Russian).

Marquard, O., Ritter, J., & Gründer, K. (1976). Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie [Historical Dictionary of Philosophy]. Schwabe. (In German).

McLuhan, H. M. (2003). Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. Kusckovo Pole. (In Russian).

Parygin, B. D. (1999). Anatomy of Communication. Mikhailova, V. A. (In Russian).

Soldatova, G. U. (2017). Russia's Digital Generation: Competence and Security. Smysl. (In Russian).

Turner, V. (1983). Symbol and Ritual. Nauka. (In Russian).

Vasilenko, L. A., & Mescheryakova, N. N. (2021). Sociology of Digital Society. Tomsk Polytechnic University. (In Russian).

Vysheslavtsev, B. P. (1982). The Crisis of Industrial Culture. Marxism, Neo-Socialism, Neoliberalism. Chalidze Publications. (In Russian).

Zhigulsky, K. (1985). Celebration and Culture. Progress. (In Russian).

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.