Abstract
The article addresses the issue of historical memory transformation in the digital era. Its aim is to critically analyze the “cancel culture” as a tool for shaping and transmitting historical identity in the digital realm and beyond. The realm of new media where the cancel culture phenomenon emerged, is selected as the field of research. Consequently, the article seeks to bridge conceptual topics in memory studies with media theory.
New media exhibit significant differences from traditional media, influencing a shift in discursive rules and leading to the reorganization of discursive spaces. The traditional vertical paternalistic discourse structure is replaced by a horizontal, rhizomatic one, and the rigid dichotomy between the author and the reader dissipates. These shifts in discursive rules bring about changes in discursive practices, impacting not only discourse itself but also the broader social fabric, including the realm of historical memory. Digitalization introduces novel forms of memory existence while retaining some traditional functions like identity formation.
New media serve as platforms for identity formation, offering opportunities for constructing and continuously reassembling identities. This article views “cancel culture” as a symbol of this reassembly, acting both as a mode of expression and a source of identity. The critical analysis underscores both the negative and positive aspects of cancel culture, elucidating its paradoxical nature and frequency in contemporary reality.
References
Anikin, D. A. (2020). Frontier Issues in Cultural Memory Research. Journal of Frontier Studies, 5(2), 12–25. https://doi.org/10.46539/jfs.v5i2.201 (In Russian).
Assmann, J. (2004). Cultural Memory and Early Civilization: Writing, Remembrance, and Political Imagination. Yazyki slavyanskoy kul'tury. (In Russian).
Barthes, R. (1989). The Death of the Author. In Selected Works: Semiotics, Poetics (pp. 384–392). Progress. (In Russian).
Baudrillard, J. (2015). Simulacra and Simulation. Postum. (In Russian).
Bouvier, G., & Machin, D. (2021). What gets lost in Twitter ‘cancel culture’ hashtags? Calling out racists reveals some limitations of social justice campaigns. Discourse & Society, 32(3), 307–327. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926520977215
Clark, M. D. (2020). DRAG THEM: A brief etymology of so-called “cancel culture”. Communication and the Public, 5(3–4), 88–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/2057047320961562
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (2010). A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. U-Faktoriya, Astrel'. (In Russian).
Demsar, V., Ferraro, C., Nguyen, J., & Sands, S. (2023). Calling for Cancellation: Understanding how Markets Are Shaped to Realign With Prevailing Societal Values. Journal of Macromarketing, 43(3), 322–350. https://doi.org/10.1177/02761467231168874
Ernst, W. (2017). Tempor(e)alities and Archive-Textures of Media-Connected Memory. In Digital Memory Studies (pp. 143–156). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315637235-6
Foucault, M. (1996). Poryadok diskursa. In Volya k istine: Po tu storonu znaniy, vlasti i seksual'nosti. Raboty raznykh let (pp. 47–96). Kastal'. (In Russian).
Friedman, L. W., & Friedman, H. H. (2008). The New Media Technologies: Overview and Research Framework. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1116771
Hoskins, A. (2017a). Memory of the Multitude: The End of Collective Memory. In Digital Memory Studies: Media Pasts in Transition (pp. 85–110). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315637235
Hoskins, A. (Ed.). (2017b). The Restless Past: An Introduction to Digital Memory and Media. In Digital Memory Studies: Media Pasts in Transition (pp. 1–24). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-0351-0704-3
Iyall Smith, K. E., & Leavy, P. (2008). Hybrid Identities: Theoretical Examinations. In Hybrid Identities: Theoretical and Empirical Examinations (pp. 1–11). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004170391.i-411.6
Kerkkhof, D. (2013). Itak, Maklyuen? Vse eshche mertv? In Antologiya mediafilosofii: Sbornik statey (pp. 248–259). Antologiya mediafilosofii: sbornik statey. (In Russian).
Lyotard, J.-F., & Thebaud, J.-L. (1985). Just Gaming. University of Minnesota Press.
Manovich, L. (2003). New Media From Borges to HTML. In The New Media Reader (pp. 13–25). Cambridge.
McLuhan, H. M. (2001). The Gutenberg Galaxy: The Making of Typographic Man. Nika-Tsentr. (In Russian).
McLuhan, H. M. (2003). Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. KANON-press-Ts, Kuchkovo pole. (In Russian).
Nora, P. (2005). The Global Rise of Remembrance. In Pamyat' o voyne 60 let spustya: Rossiya, Germaniya, Evropa (pp. 391–402). Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. (In Russian).
Parikka, J. (2017). The Underpinning Time: From Digital Memory to Network Microtemporality. In Digital Memory Studies: Media Pasts in Transition (pp. 156–173). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315637235-7
Pavlovskiy, A. F. (2023). Vvedenie. Tsifrovye ramki kollektivnoy pamyati: Kuda vedet tsifrovoy povorot v memory studies? In Pamyat' v Seti: Tsifrovoy povorot v memory studies: Sbornik statey (pp. 7–48). Izdatel'stvo Evropeyskogo universiteta v Sankt-Peterburge. (In Russian).
Phelan, S. (2023). Seven theses about the so-called culture war(s) (or some fragmentary notes on ‘cancel culture’). Cultural Studies, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2023.2199309
Pressman, J. (2014). Old Media/New Media. In The Johns Hopkins guide to digital media (pp. 365–367). Baltimore. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199937080.001.0001
Reading, A. (2016). Globital Memory. In Gender and Memory in the Globital Age (pp. 39–59). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-35263-7_3
Robertson, R. (1992). Globalization: Social Theory and Global Culture. Sage Publications.
Savchuk, V. V. (2013). Mediafilosofiya. Pristup real'nosti. Izdatel'stvo RKhGA. (In Russian).
Syrov, V N. (2021). On the Specificity of the Formation, Distribution and Translation of Memory in the Network Space. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 462, 87–95. https://doi.org/10.17223/15617793/462/11 (In Russian).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.