Ethics and Values in the Digital Environment: by the Example of Parody Videos on TikTok
pdf (Русский)

Abstract views: 190
PDF Downloads: 105

Keywords

Ethics of Parody
Ethical Expertise
Parody Videos
Digital Media
Values of Humor
Informational Services
TikTok
Humor Censorship
Humor as Social Criticism
Cultural Trauma

How to Cite

Busurkina, I. (2021). Ethics and Values in the Digital Environment: by the Example of Parody Videos on TikTok. Galactica Media: Journal of Media Studies, 3(3), 374-389. https://doi.org/10.46539/gmd.v3i3.137

Abstract

The ethics of the comic is a relatively new interdisciplinary field of knowledge that is gaining new relevance with the development of a variety of social media. The purpose of this article is to review the existing research and show by examples how ethics and values are closely related to the specific functions of social media, such as distributing parody content and commenting on it. The main focus of our study is a parody which can be defined as communicative behavior in the form of a text, movement, or even a song, imitating the characteristics or behavior of the object being ridiculed. Unlike a literal quotation, a parody reproduces the original in a distorted form for the purpose of mockery. Within this article modern ethical approaches to the evaluation of parody as well as the main functions of parody in the digital environment are considered. Based on the examples of parody videos on TikTok the particular ways of expressing social problems and cultural traumas by using the comic strategies are identified. Furthermore, the issues of algorithmic censorship concerning such videos as well as the problem of the moral autonomy of users are discussed.

https://doi.org/10.46539/gmd.v3i3.137
pdf (Русский)

References

Alexander, D. (2012). Cultural trauma and collective identity. Sociological journal, (3), 5–40. (In Russian).

Ankel, S. (2020). TikTok creators are pretending to be Holocaust victims in heaven in a new trend dubbed ‘trauma porn’. Retrieved from https://www.insider.com/tiktok-trend-shows-people-pretending-to-be-holocaust-victims-heaven-2020-8

Becker, A. & Waisanen, D. (2013). From Funny Features to Entertaining Effects: Connecting Approaches to Communication Research on Political Comedy. Review of Communication, 13 (3), 161–183. doi: 10.1080/15358593.2013.826816

Benatar, D. (1999). Prejudice in Jest: When Racial and Gender Humor Harms. Public Affairs Quarterly, 13(2), 191–203.

Bogad, L. M. (2005). Electoral Guerrilla Theatre: Radical Ridicule and Social Movements. London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203401033

D’Errico, F. & Poggi, I. (2016). The Bitter Laughter”. When Parody Is a Moral and Affective Priming in Political Persuasion. Frontiers in Psychology, 7 (1144). doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01144

Guo, M. (2018). Playfulness, parody, and carnival: Catchphrases and mood on the Chinese Internet from 2003 to 2015. Communication and the Public, 3 (2), 134–150. doi: 10.1177/2057047318770467

Hariman, R. (2008). Political Parody and Public Culture. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 94 (3), 247–272. doi: 10.1080/00335630802210369

Harvey, J. (1995). Humor as social act: Ethical issues. The Journal of Value Inquiry, 29 (1), 19–30. doi: 10.1007/BF01079060

Hmielowski, J. D., Holbert, R. L. & Lee, J. (2011). Predicting the Consumption of Political TV Satire: Affinity for Political Humor, The Daily Show, and The Colbert Report. Communication Monographs, 78 (1), 96–114. doi: 10.1080/03637751.2010.542579

Hoffman, L. H. & Young, D. G. (2011). Satire, Punch Lines, and the Nightly News: Untangling Media Effects on Political Participation. Communication Research Reports, 28 (2), 159–168. doi: 10.1080/08824096.2011.565278

Holbert, R. L. (2020). Entertainment media and politics: Advances in effects-based research. London; New York: Routledge.

Jones, M. O. (2017). Satire, social media and revolutionary cultural production in the Bahrain uprising: From utopian fiction to political satire. Communication and the Public, 2 (2), 136–153. doi: 10.1177/2057047317706372

LaFollette, H. & Shanks, N. (1993). Belief and the Basis of Humor. American Philosophical Quarterly, 30 (4), 329–339.

Lamerichs, N. (2020). User Tactics and Algorithms: A Digital Humanities Approach to YouTube and Tumblr. In D. Nguyen, I. Dekker & S. Nguyen (Eds.), Understanding Media and Society in the Age of Digitalisation (pp. 35–54). Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-38577-4_3

Lim, J. S. & Golan, G. J. (2011). Social Media Activism in Response to the Influence of Political Parody Videos on YouTube. Communication Research, 38 (5), 710–727. doi: 10.1177/0093650211405649

Lockyer, Sh. & Pickering, M. (2005). Introduction: The Ethics and Aesthetics of Humour and Comedy. In S. Lockyer & M. Pickering (Eds.), Beyond a Joke: The Limits of Humour (pp. 1–24). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. doi: 10.1057/9780230236776_1

Mackenzie, S. A. & Nichols, D. (2020). Finding ‘Places to Be Bad’ in Social Media: The Case of TikTok. In D. Nichols & S. Perillo (Eds.), Urban Australia and Post-Punk: Exploring Dogs in Space (pp. 285–298). Singapore: Springer Singapore. doi: 10.1007/978-981-32-9702-9_22

Morreall, J. (2005). Humour and the Conduct of Politics. In Sh. Lockyer & M. Pickering (Eds.), Beyond a Joke: The Limits of Humour (pp. 63–78). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. doi: 10.1057/9780230236776_4

Nabi, R. L., Moyer-Gusé, E. & Byrne, S. (2007). All Joking Aside: A Serious Investigation into the Persuasive Effect of Funny Social Issue Messages. Communication Monographs, 74 (1), 29–54. doi: 10.1080/03637750701196896

Ogbu, O. G. (2020). “She completely twisted the body language”: Pandemic, parody, politics, and comedy in the era of coronavirus. Journal of Community Safety and Well-Being, 5 (2), 82–86. doi: 10.35502/jcswb.138

Palmer, J. (2005). Parody and Decorum: Permission to Mock. In Sh. Lockyer & M. Pickering (Eds.), Beyond a Joke: The Limits of Humour (pp. 79–97). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. doi: 10.1057/9780230236776_5

Peifer, J. T. (2012). Can We Be Funny? The Social Responsibility of Political Humor. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 27 (4), 263–276. doi: 10.1080/08900523.2012.746110

Petrović, T. (2018). Political Parody and the Politics of Ambivalence. Annual Review of Anthropology, 47 (1), 201–216. doi: 10.1146/annurev-anthro-102215-100148

Piata, A. (2016). When metaphor becomes a joke: Metaphor journeys from political ads to internet memes. Journal of Pragmatics, 106, 39–56. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2016.10.003

Ruliou, A. (2015). Political Internet Memes as User-generated Political Caricatures and Means of Reaction to Propaganda: The Case of Rushka Kvadratnyi Vatnik (MA Thesis). Warsawa.

Shuster, M. (2013). Humor as an Optics: Bergson and the Ethics of Humor. Hypatia, 28 (3), 618–632. doi: 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2012.01282.x

Smuts, A. (2010). The Ethics of Humor: Can Your Sense of Humor be Wrong? Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 13 (3), 333–347. doi: 10.1007/s10677-009-9203-5

Sullivan, L. S. & Reiner, P. B. (2020). Ethics in the Digital Era: Nothing New? IT Professional, 22 (1), 39–42. doi: 10.1109/MITP.2020.2964355

Tapley, R. (2007). The Value of Humor. The Journal of Value Inquiry, 40 (4), 421–431. doi: 10.1007/s10790-006-9007-y

Troitsky, S. A. (2017). The Syntax for Loss. Studia Culturae, (32), 160–172. (In Russian).

Troitsky, S. A. (2019). Trauma construct as a basis for the formation of a topographic. The untouchable reserve. Debate about politics and culture, 123 (1), 123–131.(In Russian).

van Zoonen, L., Vis, F. & Mihelj, S. (2010). Performing citizenship on YouTube: Activism, satire and online debate around the anti-Islam video Fitna. Critical Discourse Studies, 7 (4), 249–262. doi: 10.1080/17405904.2010.511831

Vickery, J. R. (2020). The Memeification of #Schoolshootings in the U.S.: Youth, Tiktok, and Playful Mediated Bodies. In AoIR Selected Papers of Internet Research. Retrieved from https://spir.aoir.org/ojs/index.php/spir/article/view/11357

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.