The study aims to reveal the main characteristics of the historical memory and, more broadly, the attitude of the young digital generation of the Caspian region to the past, present and future. The study is based on the in-depth interviews conducted in autumn and winter 2019-2020, that involved 20 students of Astrakhan State University. The Astrakhan region with its ethno-confessional and cultural peculiarities represents quite vividly the Russian Caspian region where three world religions and more than one hundred and seventy ethnic groups are presented. The results of the study showed that the Caspian youth prefers to live in the moment, yet it does not know well the events of contemporary time. It has better knowledge of the past, and very vague ideas about the future. The Caspian youth notes a significant impact of the regional specific character on its collective ideas. In general, the interviewees showed quite a high level of tolerance towards the youth of the other Caspian countries, though not everyone considers them to be “their kin”. The range of the characteristics includes both “Ours (Own)” and “Other”, “Different”, “Alien”. The respondents consider the language barrier to be the main obstacle for intercultural communication and the development of the mutual collective memory.
Alekseev, A., & Alekseeva, I. (2018). Philosophy of Historical Memory. Problems of Philosophy, 10, 67–76. https://doi.org/10.31857/S004287440001152-2 (In Russian).
Assman, J. (2004). Cultural Memory: Writing, Memory of the Past and Political Identity in the High Cultures of Antiquity. Languages of Slavic Culture. (In Russian).
Assman, J. (2014). Long Shadow of the Past. Memorial Culture and Historical Policy. Novoe Literaturnoe Obozrenie. (In Russian).
Borisova, I. Z. (2019). The Celtic Past as a Marker of Regional Identity and the Collective Experience of the Bretons. Culture and Text, 4(39), 227–237. (In Russian).
Boykov, V. E. (2010). Historical Memory in Russian Society: State and Problems of Formation: Materials of the Round Table. Sociology of Power, 6, 47–67. (In Russian).
Dementyev, I. O. (2019). Identity and Collective Memory of Kaliningrad Residents in the Mirror of Modern Polish Research. Bulletin of the Baltic Federal University Named after I. Kant. Series: Humanities and Social Sciences, 2, 104–112. (In Russian).
Duncan, S. A. B. (2006). Memory, Trauma and World Politics: Reflections on the Relationship Between Past and Present. Palgrave.
Emelyanova, T. P. (2019). Collective Memory of the Events of National History: A Socio-Psychological Approach. Institute of Psychology RAS. (In Russian).
Emelyanova, T. P., & Drobysheva, T. V. (2017). Characteristics of Collective Memory in the Context of Socio-Psychological Characteristics of Two Generations. Horizons of Humanitarian Knowledge, 5, 71–85. https://doi.org/10.17805/ggz.2017.5.6 (In Russian).
Erokhina, E. A. (2009). Collective Memory in the Ethnic Self-Awareness of the Altai Youth. Sociological Research, 3(299), 115–120. (In Russian).
Fedorova, M. M. (2018). History/Memory: “Difficult” Dilemma. History of Philosophy, 23(1), 108–121. https://doi.org/10.21146/2074-5869-2018-23-1-108-121 (In Russian).
Fedorova, M. M., & Romanova, A. P. (2020). Generational Gap and Historical Memory of the Generation of the Digital Age. History, 11(9). https://doi.org/10.18254/S207987840012223-4 (In Russian).
Halbwachs, M. (2005). Collective and Historical Memory. Emergency Reserve, 2–3, 8–27. (In Russian).
Hutton, P. H. (1993). History as an Art of Memory. University Press of New England.
Makarov, A. I. (2008). Memory Politics as an Element of Regional Cultural Life. Power, 12, 8–11. (In Russian).
Nora, P. (1998). Generation as a Place of Memory. New Literary Review, 2(30), 48–72. (In Russian).
Romanova, A. P. (2020). Collective Memory and Generational Gap. Problems of Philosophy, 6, 33–37. https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2020-6-33-37 (In Russian).
Tappscott, D. (2009). Grown Up Digital: How the Net Generation is Changing Your World? McGraw Hill.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.