Verbal Aggression in Statements Made by the Authorities (based on materials from the “Word of the Year” contests)
pdf (Русский)
html (Русский)

Keywords

Government-Society Dialogue the Language of Power “Word of the Year” Competition Verbal Aggression The Us/Them Contraposition the Lexicon of War Xenophobia the Search for Internal “Enemies” Taboo Pronouncements One-Sided Communication

How to Cite

Kornienko, A. (2022). Verbal Aggression in Statements Made by the Authorities (based on materials from the “Word of the Year” contests). Galactica Media: Journal of Media Studies, 4(4), 143-159. https://doi.org/10.46539/gmd.v4i4.270

Abstract

This paper sets out the results of a sociolinguistic study of statements made by representatives of the modern Russian political elite, based on materials drawn from Russia’s annual “Word of the Year” competition. The acuteness of the problem of a lack of direct bilateral dialogue between government and society advances the academic task of analyzing the discourse of power and defining its key characteristics, so as to assess the readiness of leading politicians to either establish such a public dialogue, or completely abandon it. The research focused on the phenomenon of verbal aggression and its quest in the statements made by those in power as the paramount verbal attitude, testifying against any orientation towards constructive communication with all parts of society. Semantic analysis of lexical units which have won the “Word of the Year” competition in recent years (words, expressions, phrases extracted from the discourse of power) found indicators of verbal aggression. The statements of the authorities are characterized by the WE/THEY opposition, contraposing Russia to the West, military vocabulary, the contraposition of OURS/THEIRS, pointing to the search for internal “enemies”, substantive and evaluative opposition to the power of the people, sometimes in the form of morally offensive expressions. The results of the analysis indicate the rejection by the authorities of the principle of dialogue and the verbal aggression that arises from this rejection, leading to an increase in social tension in a society divided through the efforts of the political elite into evaluatively polarised “Ours” and “the Others”.

https://doi.org/10.46539/gmd.v4i4.270
pdf (Русский)
html (Русский)

References

Barthes, R. (1989). Separation of Languages. In Selected Works: Semiotics: Poetics (pp. 519–539). Progress. (In Russian).

Basovskaya, E. N. (2004). Creators of Black and White Reality: On Verbal Aggression in the Mass Media. Kritika i Semiotika, 7, 257–263. (In Russian).

Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1995). The Social Construction of Reality. A Treatise on the Sociology of Knowledge. Medium. (In Russian).

Blakar, R. M. (1987). Language as an Instrument of Social Power (Theoretical and Empirical Studies of Language and its Use in Social Context). In V. V. Petrov (Ed.), Language and the Modeling of Social Interaction: Translations (pp. 88–120). Progress. (In Russian).

Bourdieu, P. (1994). Decomposition of the Religious – Beginning. A collection of texts. Socio-Logos. https://gtmarket.ru/library/articles/2611 (In Russian).

Bourdieu, P. (2005). On the Production and Reproduction of Legitimate Language. Otechestvennye zapiski, 2. https://strana-oz.ru/2005/2/o-proizvodstve-i-vosproizvodstve-legitimnogo-yazyka (In Russian).

Decaterik, D. (2005). The New Sincerity. In Alternative Culture: Encyclopedia. Ultra. Kultura. https://info.wikireading.ru/104422 (In Russian).

Dijk, T. A. van. (2013). Discourse and Power: Representations of Dominance in Language and Communication. Librokom. (In Russian).

Epstein, M. (2013). Words as symbols of an era. A conversation with journalist Ksenia Larina. Snob. http://www.snob.ru/profile/27356/blog/70248#comment_683001 (In Russian).

Guseinov, G. C. (2008). Language and the Trauma of Liberation. New Literary Review, 6, 130–147. (In Russian).

Issers, O. S. (2020). Dimensions of a “New Sincerity” in Modern Political Communication. Vestnik NSU. Series: History and Philology, 19(6), 216–227. https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7919-2020-19-6-216-227 (In Russian).

Issers, O. S., & Ganeeva, D. A. (2013). “New Russian Word” in the Context of Political Discourse: Dialogue, Opposition, Creative Class. Political Linguistics, 3, 37–47. (In Russian).

Kaminskaya, T. L. (2020). New Trends in Russian Political Communication. Political Linguistics, 6, 12‑18. https://doi.org/10.26170/pl20-06-01 (In Russian).

Karasik, V. I. (2015). The linguistic manifestation of personality. Gnoziz. (In Russian).

Klemperer, V. (1998). LTI. The Language of the Third Reich: A Philologist's Notebook. Progress-Traditsija. (In Russian).

Kozhina, M. N. (Ed.). (2019). Stylistic Encyclopedic Dictionary of the Russian Language. FLINTA. (In Russian).

Krongauz, M. A. (2015). A short course of novoyaz. Literature questions, 1, 7–20. (In Russian).

Kuznetsov, S. A. (Ed.). (1998). Large Explanatory Dictionary of the Russian Language. Norint. (In Russian).

Lebedinskaya, E. Yu., Prokofyeva, N. A., & Sheglova, E. A. (2021). Inoagent. DataSlov. https://dataslov.ru/word/inoagent/ (In Russian).

Levontina, I. B. (2018). Why we should not worry about the fate of Russian speech. In М. Vishnevetskaya (Ed.), Dictionary of Change 2015-2016 (pp. 214–222). Tri kvadrata. (In Russian).

Nevinskaya, M. D. (2006). Conceptual opposition “people – power” in political discourse [PhD thesis]. VSPU. (In Russian).

Ozyumenko, V. I. (2017). Media Discourse in an Atmosphere of Information Warfare: From Manipulation to Aggression. Russian Journal of Linguistics, 21(1), 203–220. https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-9182-2017-21-1-203-220 (In Russian).

Prokofieva, N. A., & Shcheglova, E. A. (2020). Media dictionary of keywords of the moment: Lexical-semantic field “coronavirus”. In N. V. Kozlovskaya (Ed.), New Words and Dictionaries of New Words. 2020: Collection of Research Articles (pp. 191–202). Institute of Linguistic Studies. (In Russian).

Ruzhentseva, N. B., Koshkarova, N. N., & Chudinov, A. P. (2020). Triggers in the Power Discourse and their Reflection in the Mass-media. Yazyk i kul'tura, 50, 99–114. https://doi.org/10.17223/19996195/50/8 (In Russian).

Schmitt, K. (2011). The concept of political. Sociology of Power, 8, 173–190. (In Russian).

Shcherbinina, Yu. V. (2008). Verbal aggression. LKI. (In Russian).

Shcherbinina, Yu. V. (2013). Speech Aggression: The Territory of Enmity. Forum. (In Russian).

Sheigal, E. I. (2004). Semiotics of Political Discourse. Gnoziz. (In Russian).

Shmeleva, T. V. (1993). Key words of the present moment. Collegium, 1, 33–41. (In Russian).

Skorkin, K. (2014). The Common Language of Hate. Otechestvennye zapiski, 6. http://www.strana-oz.ru/2014/6/obshchiy-yazyk-nenavisti (In Russian).

Steksova, T. I. (2013). Speech aggression in Internet comments as a manifestation of social tension. Political Linguistics, 3, 77–81. (In Russian).

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.