Abstract
This article develops the concept of the metasimulacrum of otherness to analyze the structural transformations of difference in digital culture. Unlike traditional representations of otherness, the metasimulacrum reorganizes the very conditions of perception, producing otherness as a managed, aestheticized, and commodified flow. Digital platforms no longer marginalize or suppress difference; they integrate it into the architecture of engagement, neutralizing its disruptive force through algorithmic formatting. Otherness becomes a preformatted stimulus—clickable, reproducible, and emotionally manageable—without preserving its political or subjective density. This dynamic is situated within a broader framework of post-symbolic coloniality, where visibility itself becomes a mechanism of control rather than liberation. The analysis traces how platforms engineer conditions in which alterity appears safe, consumable, and endlessly circulated, while any radical rupture is filtered out. The article critiques liberal hopes of visibility as empowerment, arguing that digital spectacularization of otherness demands a radical rethinking of ethical relations. It proposes an ethics of refusal—respecting the Other’s right to opacity and withdrawal from the economies of attention. Ultimately, the metasimulacrum of otherness reveals how difference is preserved not to challenge, but to stabilize the algorithmic logic of contemporary platform capitalism.
References
Ahmed, S. (2004). The Cultural Politics of Emotion. Routledge.
Ahmed, S. (2013). Strange Encounters: Embodied Others in Post-Coloniality. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203349700
Amaro, R. (2022). The Black technical object: On machine learning and the aspiration of Black being. Sternberg Press.
Arendt, H. (1998). The human condition (2nd ed). University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226924571.001.0001
Baudrillard, J. (1996). The perfect crime. Verso.
Baudrillard, J. (2022). 8.2. Simulacra and simulation. In Literary Theories: A Reader and Guide (pp. 381–394). Edinburgh University Press.
Bhabha, H. K. (2003). The location of culture (Repr). Routledge.
Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Polity.
Cheng, A. A. (2019). Ornamentalism. Oxford University Press.
Chun, W. H. K., & Barnett, A. H. (2021). Discriminating data: Correlation, neighborhoods, and the new politics of recognition. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/14050.001.0001
Debord, G. (2002). The Society of the Spectacle. Hobgoblin Press.
Dijck, J. van. (2013). The culture of connectivity: A critical history of social media. Oxford University Press.
Ferrando, F. (2020). Philosophical posthumanism. Bloomsbury academic. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350059511
Fisher, M. (2009). Capitalist Realism: Is there no alternative? John Hunt Publishing.
Fraser, N. (1990). Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy. Social Text, 25/26, 56–80. https://doi.org/10.2307/466240
Gerbaudo, P. (2019). The digital party: Political organisation and online democracy. Pluto Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv86dg2g
Gillespie, T. (2018). Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, Content Moderation, and the Hidden Decisions That Shape Social Media. Yale University Press. https://doi.org/10.12987/9780300235029
Habermas, J. (1991). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society (Studies in Contemporary German Social Thought). The MIT Press.
Han, B.-C. (2015). The Transparency Society. Stanford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780804797511
Han, B.-C., & Butler, E. (2017). In the swarm: Digital prospects. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11055.001.0001
hooks, bell. (2010). Eating the Other: Desire and Resistance. In M. G. Durham & D. Kellner (Eds.), Media and cultural studies: Keyworks (Nachdr., pp. 366–380). Blackwell.
Lovink, G. (2022). Stuck on the platform: Reclaiming the Internet. Valiz.
Mignolo, W. D. (2011). The darker side of Western modernity: Global futures, decolonial options. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv125jqbw
Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. New York University Press.
Papacharissi, Z. (2010). A Private Sphere: Democracy in a Digital Age. Polity Press.
Ricaurte, P. (2019). Data Epistemologies, The Coloniality of Power, and Resistance. Television & New Media, 20(4), 350–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476419831640
Squires, C. R. (2014). The Post-Racial Mystique: Media and Race in the Twenty-First Century. New York University Press. https://doi.org/10.18574/9780814770788
Tufekci, Z. (2017). Twitter and tear gas: The power and fragility of networked protest. Yale university press.
Young, R. (2016). Postcolonialism: An historical introduction (15th Anniversary ed). Wiley Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119316817
Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power (First edition). PublicAffairs.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.