Abstract
At the end of the 20th – beginning of the 21st century, technology started to be perceived not as much as a means, but as an outlet, as a fashion, and a personalization factor, – in other words, as an expansion of ways of presence and influence. It coincides with the trend of emotional design, the production of impressions and affects, which gradually changed the approach at the level of commercial, design- and engineering solutions towards devising digital environments, bringing them closer to the new living spheres that promise radical possibilities and alternative forms of existence. The idea that digital interfaces should be functional, operational, and rational is being replaced by the imperative of affective interaction with technology. Computers do not solve problems as much as they accumulate the potential for affective-emotional interaction in new environments of life. Just as humans have built symbiotic relationships at the level of animal populations, in the same way humans have to achieve a qualitatively new grade of existence and well-being at the level of interaction with emotional machines. However, it soon turned out that the emotions released online and digitally began not so much to reflect and express personal hopes and fears, weaknesses and opportunities, as to impose themselves on humans; instead of the promised exclusivity and radicalism, they turned out to be new means of collectivization or even standardization. In other words, it was not emotions that became intermediaries for the transmission of experiences, but a person who became an intermediary for emotions – which cast doubt on the very possibility of non-algorithmic feeling and caused escapade crisis. The article shows how emotions and trials, in search of the forms of interaction with technology, pass from the early utopia of new transgressive experiences to the late digital pessimism. The concept of datarsis meaning possible use of digital platforms not for action, but for liberation from action in order to discover new forms of presence is also introduced here.
References
Chun, W. H. K. (2005). On Software, or the Persistence of Visual Knowledge. Grey Room, 18, 26–51. https://doi.org/10.1162/1526381043320741
Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. G.P. Putnam.
Dibbell, J. (2020). A Rape in Cyberspace; or, How an Evil Clown, a Haitian Trickster Spirit, Two Wizards, and a Cast of Dozens Turned a Database into a Society. In M. Dery (Ed.), Flame Wars: The Discourse of Cyberculture (pp. 237–262). Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822396765-012
Goldenberg, A., & Gross, J. J. (2020). Digital Emotion Contagion. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(4), 316–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.01.009
Jaynes, J. (1976). The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind. Houghton Mifflin.
Mark, M., & Pearson, C. S. (2001). The Hero and the Outlaw: Building Extraordinary Brands Through the Power of Archetypes. McGraw Hill Professional.
Minsky, M. L. (2006). The Emotion Machine: Commensense Thinking, Artificial Intelligence, and the Future of the Human Mind. Simon & Schuster.
Nascimento, R., Limeira, C. D., De Pinho, A. L. S., & Santa Rosa, J. G. (2014). Emotion, Affectivity and Usability in Interface Design. In A. Marcus (Ed.), Design, User Experience, and Usability. User Experience Design Practice (Vol. 8520, pp. 339–346). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07638-6_33
Parkinson, B. (2011). Interpersonal Emotion Transfer: Contagion and Social Appraisal. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5(7), 428–439. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00365.x
Parsons, T. (2009). Thinking: Objects: Contemporary approaches to product design (1st ed.). AVA Publishing SA. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350088856
Picard, R. W. (1997). Affective Computing. Cambridge, Mass. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/1140.001.0001
Schwark, J. D. (2015). Toward a Taxonomy of Affective Computing. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 31(11), 761–768. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2015.1064638
Tan, H., Tiab, J., Šabanović, S., & Hornbæk, K. (2016). Happy Moves, Sad Grooves: Using Theories of Biological Motion and Affect to Design Shape-Changing Interfaces. Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, 1282–1293. https://doi.org/10.1145/2901790.2901845
Алиев, Р. (2025). Алгоритмическая шизофрения: метасимуляционная трансформация реальности в цифровую эпоху. Логос, 35(4), 229–250. https://doi.org/10.17323/0869-5377-2025-4-229-250
Латыпова, А. Р. (2020). Между метафорой и глитчем: цифровая эволюция медиа. Эпистемология и Философия Науки, 57(2), 162–178. https://doi.org/10.5840/eps202057228
Мухина, С. Х. (2025). Интерфейс как практика себя, или Каково это—Быть живым в эпоху киборгов? Galactica Media: Journal of Media Studies, 7(2), 146–165. https://doi.org/10.46539/gmd.v7i2.648
Очеретяный, К. А. (2024a). Интерфейс животных: цифровое проектирование по ту сторону человека. Galactica Media: Journal of Media Studies, 6(4), 59–83. https://doi.org/10.46539/gmd.v6i4.582
Очеретяный, К. А. (2024b). Призрак в кармане: медиаархеология тамагочи. Galactica Media: Journal of Media Studies, 6(2), 260–276. https://doi.org/10.46539/gmd.v6i2.492

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

